1 |
Foreword
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 25 (2021): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 25 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 25 (2021): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 25 ; 2629-6055 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Generalised Crossover
|
|
|
|
In: Semantics and Linguistic Theory; Proceedings of SALT 30; 396-408 ; 2163-5951 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Minimal sufficiency with covert even
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 5, No 1 (2020); 98 ; 2397-1835 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Three Readings of Most
|
|
|
|
In: Linguistic Society of America (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Quantification into Quotations: Evidence from Japanese 'wh'-doublets
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 12 (2008): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 12; 613-627 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 12 (2008): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 12; 613-627 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Presupposed Ignorance and Exhaustification
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 19 (2015): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19; 628-640 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 19 (2015): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19; 628-640 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
E-Type Readings of Quantifiers under Ellipsis
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 20 (2016): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 20; 217-233 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 20 (2016): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 20; 217-233 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
'De Re/De Dicto' Ambiguity and Presupposition Projection
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 13 Nr. 2 (2009): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 13; 425-438 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 13 No 2 (2009): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 13; 425-438 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Nominal Ellipsis and the Interpretation of Gender in Greek
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 20 (2016): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 20; 712-729 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 20 (2016): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 20; 712-729 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Testing theories of temporal inferences: Evidence from child language
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 3, No 1 (2018); 139 ; 2397-1835 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Testing theories of temporal inferences : evidence from child language
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Person Indexicals in Uyghur Indexical Shifting
|
|
|
|
In: Sudo, Yasutada. (2016). Person Indexicals in Uyghur Indexical Shifting. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 36(36), 441 - 456. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/4k14x2df (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
The Semantic Role of Classifiers in Japanese
|
|
|
|
In: Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Experimental investigations of ambiguity: the case of most
|
|
|
|
In: Springer Netherlands (2016)
|
|
Abstract:
In the study of natural language quantification, much recent attention has been devoted to the investigation of verification procedures associated with the proportional quantifier most. The aim of these studies is to go beyond the traditional characterization of the semantics of most, which is confined to explicating its truth-functional and presuppositional content as well as its combinatorial properties, as these aspects underdetermine the correct analysis of most. The present paper contributes to this effort by presenting new experimental evidence in support of a decompositional analysis of most according to which it is a superlative construction built from a gradable predicate many or much and the superlative operator -est (Hackl, in Nat Lang Semant 17:63–98, 2009). Our evidence comes in the form of verification profiles for sentences like Most of the dots are blue which, we argue, reflect the existence of a superlative reading of most. This notably contrasts with Lidz et al.’s (Nat Lang Semant 19:227–256, 2011) results. To reconcile the two sets of data, we argue, it is necessary to take important differences in task demands into account, which impose limits on the conclusions that can be drawn from these studies.
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/106359
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
19 |
Psych verbs, the linking problem, and the acquisition of language
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Psych verbs, the Linking Problem, and the Acquisition of Language
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|