| 1 |
The processing cost of Downward Entailingness: the representation and verification of comparative constructions [Online resource]
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22, Vol. 1 / eds. Uli Sauerland and Stephanie Solt. Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft: ZAS papers in linguistics ; Nr. 60 (2018), 435-451
|
|
Linguistik-Repository
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Linguistic barriers to logical reasoning: a new perspective on Aristotelian syllogisms [Online resource]
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22, Vol. 1 / eds. Uli Sauerland and Stephanie Solt. Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft: ZAS papers in linguistics ; Nr. 60 (2018), 453-468
|
|
Linguistik-Repository
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Target article A new empirical angle on the variability debate: Quantitative neurosyntactic analyses of a large data set from Brocas Aphasia q
|
|
|
|
In: http://freud.tau.ac.il/~yosef1/papers/Drai_Grodzinsky_BL_2006a.pdf (2004)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Levels of Linguistic Representation in Broca’s Aphasia: Implicitness and Referentiality of Arguments
|
|
|
|
In: http://freud.tau.ac.il/~yosef1/papers/bast.pdf (2000)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Comprehension regularity in Broca’s aphasia: There’s more of it than you ever imagined. Brain and Language 70:139–43
|
|
|
|
In: http://freud.tau.ac.il/~yosef1/papers/drai99.pdf (1999)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
The critical role of group studies in neuropsychology: comprehension regularities in Broca’s aphasia
|
|
|
|
In: http://freud.tau.ac.il/~yosef1/papers/gpzd.pdf (1999)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Tense and Agreement in Agrammatic Production: Pruning the Syntactic Tree
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.tau.ac.il/~naamafr/docs/fg1997.pdf (1997)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
TeI Aviv University
|
|
|
|
In: http://las.sagepub.com/content/31/2/115.full.pdf (1987)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
In M.-A. Friedemann and L. Rizzi (Eds.) The Acquisition of Syntax: Studies in comparative developmental linguistics (pp. 84-104). Longman. SPLIT INFLECTION IN NEUROLINGUISTICS
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.language-brain.com/docs/Friedmann_Grodzinsky_2000_split_infl.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Split Inflection in Neurolinguistics
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.tau.ac.il/~naamafr/docs/split_infl.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
The syntactic characterization of agrammatlsm*
|
|
|
|
In: http://freud.tau.ac.il/~yosef1/papers/Grodzinsky_COG_84.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Printed in the United States of America The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.psych.yorku.ca/gigi/documents/Grodzinsky_2000.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
A blueprint for a brain map of syntax1
|
|
|
|
In: http://freud.tau.ac.il/~yosef1/papers/Grodzinsky_BR.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
* To whom correspondence should be addressed:
|
|
|
|
In: http://freud.tau.ac.il/~yosef1/papers/Santi Grodzinsky HBM in press.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
VARIATION IN BROCA’S REGION: PRELIMINARY CROSS-METHODOLOGICAL COMPARISONS
|
|
|
|
In: http://freud.tau.ac.il/~yosef1/papers/Gen.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
1 To appear in the Canadian Journal of Lingustics, special 50th anniversary issue Syntactic Dependencies as Memorized Sequences in the Brain
|
|
|
|
In: http://freud.tau.ac.il/~yosef1/papers/CJL_05.pdf
|
|
Abstract:
I would like to consider a unification of two areas in cognitive neuroscience: Investigations of working memory (WM), and the study of syntactic representation and processing. I would like to think about the functional neuroanatomy of these seemingly unrelated systems, and entertain the possibility that they may be much more closely related than previously supposed. Think of dependency relations in syntax: It is clear that their computation requires a memory. A sentence like (0), to take an extreme example, requires several memories, each with different properties: (0) [Which of the papers that he1 gave to Ms. Brown2]3 did every student1 hope t’3 that she2 will read t3 Here, not only does each pronoun relate to a different antecedent {1:(every student, he), 2:(Ms. Brown, she)}, but also, the parenthesized expression to the left must be linked to two different positions 3:(Which of the papers that he gave to Ms. Brown, t’,t). This is a truly complex structure, aspects of which will be ignored here (like quantifier scope, precedence relations among syntactic operations, etc., cf. Fox, 1999). Suffice it to note that we have at least three separate links, each with its own structural properties, each requiring a memory to hold linked parts temporarily during processing. Perhaps, I will
|
|
URL: http://freud.tau.ac.il/~yosef1/papers/CJL_05.pdf
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.534.1637
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 17 |
OFFICE HOURS by appointment
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.mcgill.ca/files/linguistics/LING619_W09.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
