1 |
'Eat meal' in Khams Tibetan in the Tibetosphere of Yunnan ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
'Eat meal' in Khams Tibetan in the Tibetosphere of Yunnan ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
An argument analysis of cognate objects in Dschang (Yemba)
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 6, No 1 (2021): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 913–926 ; 2473-8689 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
The diachrony of the cognate object construction in Romanian and Hungarian
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Refinitization of the Manner converb in Beja (Cushitic)
|
|
|
|
In: Finiteness and Nominalization ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00920531 ; Finiteness and Nominalization, John Benjamins, pp.323-344, 2016, ⟨10.1075/tsl.113⟩ (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Refinitization of the Manner converb in Beja (Cushitic)
|
|
|
|
In: Finiteness and Nominalization ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00920531 ; Finiteness and Nominalization, John Benjamins, pp.323-344, 2016, ⟨10.1075/tsl.113⟩ (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Adjectifs d’évaluation de comportement
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0378-4169 ; EISSN: 1569-9927 ; Lingvisticae Investigationes ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01532377 ; Lingvisticae Investigationes, Philadelphia; Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2013, pp.20-55. ⟨10.1075/li.36.1.02pay⟩ (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
English Cognate Object Construction: A Usage-based, Construction Grammar Approach ∗
|
|
|
|
In: http://web.kyunghee.ac.kr/~jongbok/research/final-papers/cog-obj-jn-sub-preprint.pdf (2012)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Oggetti interni e reaction objects come nomi predicativi di costrutti a verbo supporto
|
|
Mirto, I.. - : University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, 2011. : country:CZ, 2011
|
|
Abstract:
Analyses regarding clauses with a cognate object (CO), e.g. Alice laughed a scornful laugh, have frequently been based on the query: is the CO an adjunct or a complement? This paper aims to contribute to the debate with an alternative suggestion: the CO functions as a noun predicate licensing the subject, to which it assigns a semantic role, whilst the verb functions as a support (a ‘light verb’). A number of the well-known properties of COs, e.g. certain constraints on the determiner, appear to corroborate this analysis. Clauses with the so-called reaction object (RO), e.g. Alice coughed a scornful laugh, are analyzed as multi-predicative as well: also the RO is a noun predicate which licenses the subject and assigns it a semantic role. Nevertheless, the verbs behave differently: whereas in the case of COs it is irrelevant whether the verb licenses the subject and assigns it a semantic role, inasmuch as such a role would be identical to that assigned by the CO, in the RO construction the verb does re-license the subject and assigns it an additional semantic role.
|
|
Keyword:
cognate object; light verb; reaction object; semantic roles; Settore L-LIN/01 - Glottologia E Linguistica
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10447/103679
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|