1 |
Texting behaviors of individuals with aphasia (Kinsey et al., 2021) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Texting behaviors of individuals with aphasia (Kinsey et al., 2021) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Eye Tracking as a Tool to Identify Mood in Aphasia: A Feasibility Study ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Ashaie_Supp.Tables – Supplemental material for Eye Tracking as a Tool to Identify Mood in Aphasia: A Feasibility Study ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Eye Tracking as a Tool to Identify Mood in Aphasia: A Feasibility Study ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Ashaie_Supp.Tables – Supplemental material for Eye Tracking as a Tool to Identify Mood in Aphasia: A Feasibility Study ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Optimising recovery in aphasia: Learning following exposure to a single dose of computer-based script training ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Optimising recovery in aphasia: Learning following exposure to a single dose of computer-based script training ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Validity, reliability and sensitivity of the NORLA-6: Naming and oral reading for language in aphasia 6-point scale ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Validity, reliability and sensitivity of the NORLA-6: Naming and oral reading for language in aphasia 6-point scale ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Evaluating the impact of practice conditions (randomized vs. blocked) and schedule (distributed vs. massed) on script training in aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Attention in Individuals with Aphasia: Performance on the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test-2(nd) Edition
|
|
|
|
In: Neuropsychol Rehabil (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: the ROMA consensus statement
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: the ROMA consensus statement
|
|
Wallace, Sarah J.; Worrall, Linda; Rose, Tanya; Le Dorze, Guylaine; Breitenstein, Caterina; Hilari, Katerina; Babbitt, Edna; Bose, Arpita; Brady, Marian; Cherney, Leora R.; Copland, David; Cruice, Madeline; Enderby, Pam; Hersh, Deborah; Howe, Tami; Kelly, Helen; Kiran, Swathi; Laska, Ann-Charlotte; Marshall, Jane; Nicholas, Marjorie; Patterson, Janet; Pearl, Gill; Rochon, Elizabeth; Rose, Miranda; Sage, Karen; Small, Steven; Webster, Janet. - : SAGE Publications, 2018
|
|
Abstract:
Background A core outcome set (COS; an agreed, minimum set of outcomes) was needed to address the heterogeneous measurement of outcomes in aphasia treatment research and to facilitate the production of transparent, meaningful, and efficient outcome data. Objective The Research Outcome Measurement in Aphasia (ROMA) consensus statement provides evidence-based recommendations for the measurement of outcomes for adults with post-stroke aphasia within phases I-IV aphasia treatment studies. Methods This statement was informed by a four-year program of research, which comprised investigation of stakeholder-important outcomes using consensus processes, a scoping review of aphasia outcome measurement instruments, and an international consensus meeting. This paper provides an overview of this process and presents the results and recommendations arising from the international consensus meeting. Results Five essential outcome constructs were identified: Language, communication, patient-reported satisfaction with treatment and impact of treatment, emotional wellbeing, and quality of life. Consensus was reached for the following measurement instruments: Language: The Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WAB-R) (74% consensus); emotional wellbeing: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)-12 (83% consensus); quality of life: Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) (96% consensus). Consensus was unable to be reached for measures of communication (where multiple measures exist) or patient-reported satisfaction with treatment or impact of treatment (where no measures exist). Discussion Harmonization of the ROMA COS with other core outcome initiatives in stroke rehabilitation is discussed. Ongoing research and consensus processes are outlined. Conclusion The WAB-R, GHQ-12, and SAQOL-39 are recommended to be routinely included within phases I-IV aphasia treatment studies. This consensus statement has been endorsed by the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists, the British Aphasiology Society, the German Society for Aphasia Research and Therapy, and the Royal College of Speech Language Therapists.
|
|
Keyword:
2808 Neurology; Neurology
|
|
URL: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:568204a
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
16 |
Validity, Reliability, and Sensitivity of the NORLA-6: Naming and Oral Reading for Language in Aphasia 6-Point Scale
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Who benefits from an intensive comprehensive aphasia program?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Impact of Personal Relevance on Acquisition and Generalization of Script Training for Aphasia: A Preliminary Analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Structure, processes, and retrospective outcomes from an intensive comprehensive aphasia program
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|