| 1 |
Syntax of reduplication and negative-polarity items in Buli
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 7, No 1 (2022): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 5252 ; 2473-8689 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Animacy hierarchy and case/agreement in Okinawan
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 7, No 1 (2022): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 5255 ; 2473-8689 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Indeterminates in comparatives as free choice items
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 7, No 1 (2022): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 5292 ; 2473-8689 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Sluicing cannot apply in-situ in Japanese
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 6, No 1 (2021): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 317–324 ; 2473-8689 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Bare indeterminates in unconditionals
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 5, No 1 (2020): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 395–409 ; 2473-8689 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
The origin and architecture of existential indeterminates in Okinawan
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 5, No 1 (2020): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 384–394 ; 2473-8689 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
The singularity of indeterminates: Number specification without classifiers
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 4 (2019): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 23:1–10 ; 2473-8689 (2019)
|
|
Abstract:
Japanese does not have number morphology or agreement. Thus, a bare noun like inu ‘dog’ can refer to a single dog or more than one dog, depending on contexts. This fact has raised much controversy about whether grammatical number exists in Japanese and has led some researchers to regard Japanese as a language lacking number specification in bare nouns (Chierchia 1998; Martin 1975; Nakanishi & Tomioka 2004; Nomoto 2013) and abstract number/phi agreement (Fukui 1986, 1995, Kuroda 1988; Fukui and Sakai 2003, Saito 2007, 2017, among others). Recently, however, Watanabe (2017) has provided strong evidence against such views, based on partitive interpretations of bare nouns. In this paper, I uncover yet another novel piece of evidence for grammatical number specification in Japanese from indeterminates. Surprisingly, they are obligatorily specified for singular despite the lack of number morphology or classifier.
|
|
Keyword:
classifiers; indefinite pronouns; indeterminates; mass/count distinc- tion; number; singular/plural distinction; Syntax
|
|
URL: http://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/PLSA/article/view/4526
https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v4i1.4526
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Something visible in Japanese
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 3, No 1 (2018); 132 ; 2397-1835 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
A comparative syntax of internally-headed relative clauses in Gur
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 2, No 1 (2017); 27 ; 2397-1835 (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
The Faculty of Language Integrates the Two Core Systems of Number
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
The Faculty of Language Integrates the Two Core Systems of Number
|
|
|
|
In: Frontiers (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
