1 |
Effect of lexical accessibility on syntactic production in aphasia: An eyetracking study
|
|
|
|
In: Aphasiology (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Aligning sentence structures in dialogue: evidence from aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Priming sentence comprehension in aphasia: Effects of lexically independent and specific structural priming
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Priming Sentence Comprehension in Older Adults
|
|
|
|
In: Theses and Dissertations Available from ProQuest (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Agrammatic Aphasia and Healthy Speakers (Lee et al., 2015) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Agrammatic Aphasia and Healthy Speakers (Lee et al., 2015) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Exploring Korean students’ orientations to English during their study at a UK university
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Production and Comprehension of Time Reference in Korean Nonfluent Aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Syntactic and morphosyntactic processing in stroke–induced and primary progressive aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Verbal morphology in agrammatic and anomic aphasia: comparison of structured vs. narrative elicitation tasks
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Real-time production of arguments and adjuncts in normal and agrammatic speakers
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Two eyetracking experiments examined the real-time production of verb arguments and adjuncts in healthy and agrammatic aphasic speakers. Verb argument structure has been suggested to play an important role during grammatical encoding (Bock & Levelt, 1994) and in speech deficits of agrammatic aphasic speakers (Thompson, 2003). However, little is known about how adjuncts are processed during sentence production. The present experiments measured eye movements while speakers were producing sentences with a goal argument (e.g., the mother is applying lotion to the baby) and a beneficiary adjunct phrase (e.g., the mother is choosing lotion for the baby) using a set of computer-displayed written words. Results showed that the sentence production system experiences greater processing cost for producing adjuncts than verb arguments and this distinction is preserved even after brain-damage. In Experiment 1, healthy young speakers showed greater gaze durations and gaze shifts for adjuncts as compared to arguments. The same patterns were found in agrammatic and older speakers in Experiment 2. Interestingly, the three groups of speakers showed different time courses for encoding adjuncts: young speakers showed greater processing cost for adjuncts during speech, consistent with incremental production (Kempen & Hoenkamp, 1987). Older speakers showed this difference both before speech onset and during speech, while aphasic speakers appeared to preplan adjuncts before speech onset. These findings suggest that the degree of incrementality may be affected by speakers’ linguistic capacity.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3272782 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22319222 https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.496237
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
17 |
Time reference in agrammatic aphasia: A cross-linguistic study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Noun and verb naming: Phonological facilitation effects on naming latencies and viewing times in agrammatic vs. anomic aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Real-time production of unaccusative vs. unergative sentences in normal and agrammatic speakers: an eyetracking study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|