1 |
Effect of lexical accessibility on syntactic production in aphasia: An eyetracking study
|
|
|
|
In: Aphasiology (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Aligning sentence structures in dialogue: evidence from aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Priming sentence comprehension in aphasia: Effects of lexically independent and specific structural priming
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Priming Sentence Comprehension in Older Adults
|
|
|
|
In: Theses and Dissertations Available from ProQuest (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Agrammatic Aphasia and Healthy Speakers (Lee et al., 2015) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Agrammatic Aphasia and Healthy Speakers (Lee et al., 2015) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Exploring Korean students’ orientations to English during their study at a UK university
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Production and Comprehension of Time Reference in Korean Nonfluent Aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Syntactic and morphosyntactic processing in stroke–induced and primary progressive aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Verbal morphology in agrammatic and anomic aphasia: comparison of structured vs. narrative elicitation tasks
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Studies evaluating phonological contrast learning typically investigate either the predictiveness of specific pretraining aptitude measures or the efficacy of different instructional paradigms. However, little research considers how these factors interact—whether different students learn better from different types of instruction—and what the psychological basis for any interaction might be. The present study demonstrates that successfully learning a foreign-language phonological contrast for pitch depends on an interaction between individual differences in perceptual abilities and the design of the training paradigm. Training from stimuli with high acoustic-phonetic variability is generally thought to improve learning; however, we found high-variability training enhanced learning only for individuals with strong perceptual abilities. Learners with weaker perceptual abilities were actually impaired by high-variability training relative to a low-variability condition. A second experiment assessing variations on the high-variability training design determined that the property of this learning environment most detrimental to perceptually weak learners is the amount of trial-by-trial variability. Learners’ perceptual limitations can thus override the benefits of high-variability training where trial-by-trial variability in other irrelevant acoustic-phonetic features obfuscates access to the target feature. These results demonstrate the importance of considering individual differences in pretraining aptitudes when evaluating the efficacy of any speech training paradigm.
|
|
Keyword:
Speech Perception [71]
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21786912 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3155595 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3593366
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
16 |
Real-time production of arguments and adjuncts in normal and agrammatic speakers
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Time reference in agrammatic aphasia: A cross-linguistic study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Noun and verb naming: Phonological facilitation effects on naming latencies and viewing times in agrammatic vs. anomic aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Real-time production of unaccusative vs. unergative sentences in normal and agrammatic speakers: an eyetracking study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|