42 |
Bilingual Cortical Control of Between- and Within-Language Competition
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
43 |
Covert Co-Activation of Bilinguals’ Non-Target Language: Phonological Competition from Translations
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
44 |
Cross-linguistic phonotactic competition and cognitive control in bilinguals
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
45 |
Orthographic and Phonological Neighborhood Databases across Multiple Languages
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
46 |
Phonotactic Constraints Are Activated across Languages in Bilinguals
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
47 |
The influence of native-language tones on lexical access in the second language
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
48 |
Orthographic Knowledge and Lexical Form Influence Vocabulary Learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
49 |
Auditory word recognition across the lifespan: Links between linguistic and nonlinguistic inhibitory control in bilinguals and monolinguals
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
50 |
Bilinguals’ Existing Languages Benefit Vocabulary Learning in a Third Language
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Learning a new language involves substantial vocabulary acquisition. Learners can accelerate this process by relying on words with native-language overlap, such as cognates. For bilingual third language learners, it is necessary to determine how their two existing languages interact during novel language learning. A scaffolding account predicts transfer from either language for individual words, whereas an accumulation account predicts cumulative transfer from both languages. To compare these accounts, twenty English-German bilingual adults were taught an artificial language containing 48 novel written words that varied orthogonally in English and German wordlikeness (neighborhood size and orthotactic probability). Wordlikeness in each language improved word production accuracy, and similarity to one language provided the same benefit as dual-language overlap. In addition, participants’ memory for novel words was affected by the statistical distributions of letters in the novel language. Results indicate that bilinguals utilize both languages during third language acquisition, supporting a scaffolding learning model.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5538263/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28781384 https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12200
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
53 |
Bilingual children show an advantage in controlling verbal interference during spoken language comprehension
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
54 |
Speakers of Different Languages Process the Visual World Differently
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
55 |
Parallel language activation and inhibitory control in bimodal bilinguals
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
56 |
Bilinguals Show Weaker Lexical Access During Spoken Sentence Comprehension
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
57 |
Bilingual children show an advantage in controlling verbal interference during spoken language comprehension*
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
58 |
Audio-Visual Object Search is Changed by Bilingual Experience
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
59 |
Linguistic Predictors of Cultural Identification in Bilinguals
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|