Page: 1... 26 27 28 29 30 31
| 582 |
LOAN WORDS IN SPORTS TERMINOLOGY IN SERBIAN UDC 796:801.316.3(006.72)
|
|
|
|
In: http://facta.junis.ni.ac.rs/pe/pe98/pe98-05.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 583 |
Lexicographic codificationofEnglish-basedsynonyms in Serbian
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.suedslavistik-online.de/03/milic.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 584 |
A DISCOURSE BASED STUDY ON THEME IN KOREAN AND TEXTUAL MEANING IN TRANSLATION
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.researchonline.mq.edu.au/vital/access/services/Download/mq:1493/SOURCE3/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 585 |
Russian CliPS: a Corpus of Narratives by Brain-Damaged Individuals
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/128/004/ecp16128004.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 586 |
West-Chadic (Afro-Asiatic) language, spoken in Gombe State in North-Eastern Nigeria.
|
|
|
|
In: http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~gast/swl3/abstracts/pdf/swl-110.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 587 |
Understanding PC-based machine translation systems for evaluation, teaching, and reverse engineering: the treatment of noun phrases in Power Translator
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.dlsi.ua.es/~mlf/mtr98.ps.Z
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 588 |
Journal of Object Technology Published by AITO — Association Internationale pour les Technologies Objets, c ○ JOT 2011 Online at
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.jot.fm/issues/issue_2012_04/article7.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 590 |
Information Structure in African Languages: Corpora and Tools
|
|
|
|
In: http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W09/W09-0703.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 591 |
Age Effects in Processing Bilinguals ’ Accented Speech
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.lingref.com/isb/4/164ISB4.PDF
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 592 |
B. CONTEXT AND HISTORY OF THE ISSUE.2
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/sc/pubs/obstacles_linguistiques-linguistic_barriers/tns_independent study_finalversionenglish_april6_2006.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 593 |
Blurring the Borders between Object Composition, Inheritance, and Delegation
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.cs.jyu.fi/~sakkinen/inhws/papers/Ostermann.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 595 |
Valence and Arousal Ratings for 420 Finnish Nouns by Age and Gender
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 596 |
Coreference Annotation in the Russian Clinical Pear Stories Corpus: Annotation Features and Preliminary Results
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This work is devoted to the distribution of different referential devices in spoken discourse produced by healthy speakers and people with aphasia and its comparison to written discourse. We discuss some special annotation issues for the corpus of Pear film retellings (Russian CliPS) by people with aphasia (PWA), right hemisphere damage (RHD), and healthy speakers (HP for healthy people) of Russian. The study summarizes the comprehensive annotation schema developed for this task and the preliminary research of the referential choice features based on the corpus. Comparing retellings and written texts, we found a significant difference in the use of basic coreferential expressions between the two. Firstly, there is a significant difference in the distribution of basic NP types. Speakers use reduced devices such as zero anaphora or bare nouns in retellings more frequently than in written texts. There are also differences in the distribution of more granulated features such as the word order within an NP, the use of anaphoric and reduced expressions (demonstratives or zero NPs) for the first mention of an entity, and the inclusion of epistemic markers into NPs. We also found that the retellings produced by PWA and HP do not differ much in terms of the distribution of basic NP types. However, a detailed analysis within different NP types and taking into consideration various disfluencies reveals some prominent differences between the two populations. These include a difference in zero subject distribution, the frequency of non-referential NP links, the frequency of co-reference errors. While adapting the initial coreference annotation scheme we concluded that besides referential ambiguity, which is normally taken into account in spoken discourse analysis, and basic taxonomy of the referential devices (full NP vs. anaphoric pronoun vs. anaphoric zero), other features need to be considered ; coreference annotation, retellings corpus, discourse, brain damage, aphasia
|
|
URL: https://wp.hse.ru/data/2016/12/15/1111579976/50LNG2016.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 597 |
Alaskan Russian Through the Prism of the Ninilchik Russian Dictionary Project: “Archaeological” Approach to Language Documentation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 599 |
Is the coexistence of Catalan and Spanish possible in Catalonia?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 600 |
The importance of interlinguistic similarity and stable bilingualism when two languages compete
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
Page: 1... 26 27 28 29 30 31 |
|
