3 |
Production vs Perception: The Role of Individuality in Usage-Based Grammar Induction ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Experimental evidence on the individuality of lexicogrammar ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Experimental evidence on the individuality of lexicogrammar ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Usage-based approaches predict that each person possesses a unique linguistic system because each person’s experience and interpretation of the linguistic input is also arguably unique. This hypothesis implies that, all other factors being equal, each person has a unique set of preferred variants of lexicogrammatical alternations. Corpus research conducted so far on idiolect or individuality in language is indeed largely consistent with this prediction (Barlow 2013; Anthonissen & Petré 2019; Schmid & Mantlik 2015), and so is the real experience of forensic linguists working on cases of disputed authorship (Coulthard, Johnson & Wright 2017) and computational authorship attribution research (Stamatatos 2009; Grieve 2007). However, despite some relevant work (Dąbrowska 2018; Dąbrowska 2012), not enough experimental research has been conducted to test this hypothesis. The present paper reports on new experimental evidence on the individuality of sets of lexicogrammatical variants. A sample of eight ... : {"references": ["Anthonissen, Lynn & Peter Petr\u00e9. 2019. Grammaticalization and the linguistic individual: new avenues in lifespan research. Linguistics Vanguard. doi:10.1515/lingvan-2018-0037.", "Barlow, Michael. 2013. Individual differences and usage-based grammar. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(4). 443\u2013478. doi:10.1075/ijcl.18.4.01bar.", "Coulthard, Malcolm, A Johnson & David Wright. 2017. An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics. London: Routledge.", "D\u0105browska, Ewa. 2012. Different speakers, different grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2(3). 219\u2013253. doi:10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab.", "D\u0105browska, Ewa. 2018. Experience, aptitude and individual differences in native language ultimate attainment. Cognition 178(May). 222\u2013235. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.018.", "Grieve, Jack. 2007. Quantitative authorship attribution: An evaluation of techniques. Literary and Linguistic Computing 22(3). 251\u2013270.", "Schmid, Hans-J\u00f6rg & Annette ...
|
|
Keyword:
cognitive linguistics; grammatical alternations; idiolect; linguistic individuality; usage-based linguistics
|
|
URL: https://zenodo.org/record/5227221 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5227221
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
11 |
The graphical representation of phonological dialect features of the North of England on social media
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Mapping Lexical Dialect Variation in British English Using Twitter
|
|
|
|
In: Front Artif Intell (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
JEngL_Supplemental – Supplemental material for Mapping Lexical Innovation on American Social Media ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
JEngL_Supplemental – Supplemental material for Mapping Lexical Innovation on American Social Media ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
The application of growth curve modeling for the analysis of diachronic corpora
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Analyzing lexical emergence in modern American English online
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|