| 3 |
Taking a closer look at visual search: just how feature-agnostic is singleton detection mode?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
The curious case of spillover: does it tell us much about saccade timing in reading?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Accumulating evidence about what prospective memory costs actually reveal
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Accumulating evidence about what prospective memory costs actually reveal
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Short-term and long-term attentional biases to frequently encountered target features
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Threat captures attention, but not automatically: top-down goals modulate attentional orienting to threat distractors
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Previously seen and expected stimuli elicit surprise in the context of visual search
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Capture by colour: evidence for dimension-specific singleton capture
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Previous work on attentional capture has shown the attentional system to be quite flexible in the stimulus properties it can be set to respond to. Several different attentional “modes” have been identified. Feature search mode allows attention to be set for specific features of a target (e.g., red). Singleton detection mode sets attention to respond to any discrepant item (“singleton”) in the display. Relational search sets attention for the relative properties of the target in relation to the distractors (e.g., redder, larger). Recently, a new attentional mode was proposed that sets attention to respond to any singleton within a particular feature dimension (e.g., colour; Folk & Anderson, 2010). We tested this proposal against the predictions of previously established attentional modes. In a spatial cueing paradigm, participants searched for a colour target that was randomly either red or green. The nature of the attentional control setting was probed by presenting an irrelevant singleton cue prior to the target display and assessing whether it attracted attention. In all experiments, the cues were red, green, blue, or a white stimulus rapidly rotated (motion cue). The results of three experiments support the existence of a “colour singleton set,” finding that all colour cues captured attention strongly, while motion cues captured attention only weakly or not at all. Notably, we also found that capture by motion cues in search for colour targets was moderated by their frequency; rare motion cues captured attention (weakly), while frequent motion cues did not.
|
|
Keyword:
1203 Language and Linguistics; 2809 Sensory Systems; 3205 Experimental and Cognitive Psychology; 3310 Linguistics and Language; Attention: selective; Attention: space-based; Attentional capture
|
|
URL: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:383923
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Modulation of spatial attention by goals, statistical learning, and monetary reward
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Onsets do not override top-down goals, but they are responded to more quickly
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Wait a second: brief delays in responding reduce focality effects in event-based prospective memory
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Can attentional control settings be maintained for two color-location conjunctions? Evidence from an RSVP task
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
