2 |
Semantics and pragmatics. Drawing a line. Cham: Springer
|
|
|
|
In: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01896132 ; 2017 (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Pragmatic enrichment and saturation, completion and expansion: a view from linguistics
|
|
|
|
In: Semantics and pragmatics. Drawing a line. ; https://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-01614446 ; In Depraetere, Ilse and Raphael Salkie (eds.) Semantics and pragmatics. Drawing a line. , Springer, pp.11-38, 2017 (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Introduction
|
|
|
|
In: Semantics and pragmatics. Drawing a line ; https://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-01614445 ; Ilse Depraetere & Raphael Salkie. Semantics and pragmatics. Drawing a line, Springer, pp.1-10, 2017 (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Free pragmatic enrichment, expansion, saturation, completion: a view from linguistics
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Legal phraseology in contrast: the fact that and its German counterparts
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Tense
|
|
|
|
In: The Routledge handbook of semantics ; https://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-01187458 ; Nick Riemer. The Routledge handbook of semantics, Routledge, pp.354-369, 2016 (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
The Proper Name Theory of Quotation and Indirect Reported Speech
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
The Proper Name Theory of Quotation (PNTQ) is widely regarded as a spectacular failure. I argue here that the theory works very well when it is based on a sound understanding of properhood. I outline the analysis of proper names in Coates (2006, 2009), and use it to underpin a revised version of PNTQ. I show that the arguments against the traditional version of PNTQ (the version associated with Quine and Tarski) do not threaten the revised version. I then claim that a clear distinction between Direct Reported Speech (DRS) and Indirect Reported Speech (IRS) emerges naturally when PNTQ is supplemented with an analysis which treats quoting, attributing and reporting as types of speech act. DRS combines the speech acts of quoting and attribution. IRS does not involve quoting, just explicit attributing. The characteristic features of DRS and IRS, and the differences between them, are natural consequences of this analysis.
|
|
Keyword:
Q100 Linguistics
|
|
URL: http://eprints.brighton.ac.uk/15359/ http://eprints.brighton.ac.uk/15359/1/Salkie%20PNTQ%20as%20published.pdf http://www.springer.com/gb/book/9783319213941
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
18 |
A lexicographical minefield: treatment of nonstandard like in dictionaries
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|