| 1 |
The effects of phonological ambiguity on maintenance in verbal short-term memory ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Explaining face-voice matching decisions: The contribution of mouth movements, stimulus effects and response biases
|
|
|
|
In: Atten Percept Psychophys (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Unimodal and cross-modal identity judgements using an audio-visual sorting task: Evidence for independent processing of faces and voices
|
|
|
|
In: Mem Cognit (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Functional organisation for verb generation in children with developmental language disorder
|
|
|
|
In: Neuroimage (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Functional organisation for verb generation in children with developmental language disorder
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Matching novel face and voice identity using static and dynamic facial images
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Research investigating whether faces and voices share common source identity information has offered contradictory results. Accurate face–voice matching is consistently above chance when the facial stimuli are dynamic, but not when the facial stimuli are static. We tested whether procedural differences might help to account for the previous inconsistencies. In Experiment 1, participants completed a sequential two-alternative forced choice matching task. They either heard a voice and then saw two faces or saw a face and then heard two voices. Face–voice matching was above chance when the facial stimuli were dynamic and articulating, but not when they were static. In Experiment 2, we tested whether matching was more accurate when faces and voices were presented simultaneously. The participants saw two face–voice combinations, presented one after the other. They had to decide which combination was the same identity. As in Experiment 1, only dynamic face–voice matching was above chance. In Experiment 3, participants heard a voice and then saw two static faces presented simultaneously. With this procedure, static face–voice matching was above chance. The overall results, analyzed using multilevel modeling, showed that voices and dynamic articulating faces, as well as voices and static faces, share concordant source identity information. It seems, therefore, that above-chance static face–voice matching is sensitive to the experimental procedure employed. In addition, the inconsistencies in previous research might depend on the specific stimulus sets used; our multilevel modeling analyses show that some people look and sound more similar than others.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26732264
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-1045-8
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819615/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
