1 |
Communicating with robots: What we do wrong and what we do right in artificial social intelligence, and what we need to do better
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Modelling the early expressive communicative trajectories of infants/toddlers with early cochlear implants
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
The Effect of Word Predictability on Phonological Activation in Cantonese Reading: A Study of Eye-Fixations and Pupillary Response
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Re-evaluating how to measure jurors’ comprehension and application of jury instructions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Editorial: Intra- and Inter-individual Variability of Executive Functions: Determinant and Modulating Factors in Healthy and Pathological Conditions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Finding the meaning of meaning: Emerging insights on four grand questions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Self-efficacy beliefs influencing year 9 students' actions in a bilingual learning management system
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
The shape of things to come in speech production: visual form interference during lexical access
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
No lexical competition without priming: evidence from the picture–word interference paradigm
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Intellectual performance and ego depletion: role of the self in logical reasoning and other information processing
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
A developmental perspective on processing semantic context: preliminary evidence from sentential auditory word repetition in school-aged children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
“Nothing about us without us”: navigating engagement as hearing researcher in the deaf community
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Revisiting the "Enigma" of musicians with dyslexia: Auditory sequencing and speech abilities
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Deconstructing the simplification of jury instructions: how simplifying the features of complexity affects jurors' application of instructions
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Research consistently shows that techniques currently used to simplify jury instructions do not always improve mock jurors' comprehension. If improvements are observed, these are limited and overall comprehension remains low. It is unclear, however, why this occurs. It is possible that current simplification techniques do not effectively simplify the features of complexity, present in standardized instructions, which have the greatest effect on jurors' comprehension. It is not yet known, however, how much each feature of complexity individually affects jurors' comprehension. To investigate this, the authors used existing data from published empirical studies to examine how simplifying each feature of complexity affects mock jurors' application of instructions, as jurors can only apply instructions to the extent they understand them. The results suggest that reducing the conceptual complexity and proportion of supplementary information was associated with increased application of the instructions; however, reducing both the linguistic complexity and amount of information, and providing the instructions in a written format was not. In addition, results showed an unexpected adverse effect of simplification - reducing the amount of information was associated with an increase in the punitiveness of mock jurors' verdicts, independently of the instruction content. Together, these results suggest a need to make jury instructions comprehensible, highlight the key principles in the decision-process, and identify a way to eliminate the negative effect of reducing the amount of information. Addressing these needs is essential for developing a simplification technique that maximizes jurors' comprehension and application of instructions, while minimizing the previously overlooked negative effects of simplification.
|
|
Keyword:
1201 Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous); 2738 Psychiatry and Mental health; 3200 Psychology; 3308 Law; Application; Comprehension; Judicial directions; Jury instructions; Simplification
|
|
URL: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:676191
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
17 |
Linking extreme response style to response processes: a cross-cultural mixed methods approach
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Pragmatic prospection: how and why people think about the future
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Integrating global and local perspectives in psycholexical studies: a GloCal approach
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Let's not miss the forest for the trees: A reply to Montefinese and Vinson's (2015) commentary on Vieth et al. (2014)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|