| 1 |
How Is Cultural Intelligence Related to Human Behavior?
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Intelligence; Volume 10; Issue 1; Pages: 3 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Russia-My History: The Amazing Transformations of a History Exhibit in Post-Crimean Russia
|
|
|
|
In: Doctoral Dissertations (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Argumentação retórica e ethos organizacional ; Rhetorical argumentation and organizational ethoscase studies in Portuguese contexts ; estudos de caso em contexto português
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Contextual Communicative Competence in Multinational Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
In: Buildings; Volume 11; Issue 9; Pages: 403 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Women Entrepreneurs in China: Dialectical Discourses, Situated Activities, and the (Re)production of Gender and Entrepreneurship
|
|
Tian, Zhenyu. - : Digital Commons @ University of South Florida, 2021
|
|
In: Graduate Theses and Dissertations (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Revealing Challenges of Teaching Secrecy
|
|
|
|
In: Secrecy and Society (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Classifying Laughter: An Exploration Of The Identification and Acoustic Features of Laughter Types
|
|
|
|
In: Joseph Wharton Scholars (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Rhetorical argumentation and organizational ethos: case studies in Portuguese contexts ; Argumentação retórica e ethos organizacional: estudos de caso em contexto português
|
|
|
|
In: Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; Vol 43 No 1 (2021): Jan.-June; e56904 ; Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; v. 43 n. 1 (2021): Jan.-June; e56904 ; 1983-4683 ; 1983-4675 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Dis/organizing Social Capital: Tension in a U.S. National Park
|
|
|
|
In: Boise State University Theses and Dissertations (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Rezistance: Diné Grassroots Organization and Modes of Activism
|
|
|
|
In: Senior Projects Spring 2020 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Experiences and Perspectives of Activity Facilitators in Memory Care
|
|
|
|
In: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1586808219109459 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
“Knowledge Puffs Up”: The Evangelical Culture of Anti—Intellectualism as a Local Strategy
|
|
|
|
In: Sermon Studies (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
"Woman Problems": Superior-Subordinate Communication of Endometriosis
|
|
|
|
In: Masters Theses & Specialist Projects (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
IEP stakeholder communication and collaboration and its effects on student placement ...
|
|
Stork, Micah. - : University of Southern California Digital Library (USC.DL), 2019
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
The Rhetorical Situation Meets Adult Education: A Public Speaking Workshop for B-School Graduate Students
|
|
|
|
In: Lindsey Ives (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Digital public discourses on antibiotic resistance in Switzerland ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Cyber Metaphors and Cyber Goals: Lessons from “Flatland”
|
|
|
|
In: Military Cyber Affairs (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Communication as Constitutive of Organization: Practicing Collaboration in and English Language Program
|
|
|
|
In: Graduate Theses and Dissertations (2019)
|
|
Abstract:
This dissertation is about collaboration as an organizational practice that is communicatively constituted. Specifically, I examine how members of a team in an English language program located in a large southeastern university in the United States make sense of what they define as a collaborative work environment and materialize it in their meetings in spoken and written discourse, and in their mention and use of organizational artifacts. Though the study examines the practices of one organizational setting, the insights generated illuminate broader organizational and discourse dynamics and speak to important issues in the discipline of communication such as authority, leadership, organization sensemaking, materiality, and the role of texts in organizations. The data in this dissertation consists of spoken and written discourse. The spoken and written discourse data consist of 11 audiorecorded and transcribed meetings. To collect these data, I attended team meetings for a period of one year. I transcribed selected meeting data, and analyzed this data using a tool kit called discourse analysis. The written discourse data I examine is comprised of two documents: The Statement of Core Values and the Philosophy on Teamwork. My analysis shows how team members operating in a collaborative environment favor strategies that lead to consensus. These strategies include the use of politeness strategies such as the use of mitigating and inclusive language. Team members also use discursive strategies that demonstrate top down leadership and authority, albeit marked by indirectness. I offer practical recommendations for practice starting with the idea that collaboration does not have meaning outside of communication; collaboration means what the members of a discourse community say it means. I contend that discourse analysis can be a useful tool for organizational members as it can help them become mindful of the language they use and its constitutive force in the workplace. I also offer suggestions that can help organizations retroactively make sense of their organizational texts to ensure that they are accountable to others for what their organizations stand for.
|
|
Keyword:
Communication; Discourse analysis; Leadership; Meetings; Organizational Behavior and Theory; Texts
|
|
URL: https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/7858
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9055&context=etd
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
