1 |
[Rezension zu:] Grund und Grenze des Verstehens : Theologie und Hermeneutik im Anschluss an Friedrich Schleiermacher / Florian Priesemuth. - Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020 (Schleiermacher-Archiv ; 32)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Aus der Editionswerkstatt: Schleiermachers Praktische Theologie – Frerichs’ Ausgabe in ihre Quellen zerlegt
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
The Terms of “You(s)”: How the Term of Address Used by Conversational Agents Influences User Evaluations in French and German Linguaculture ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Die Ent_Erwähnung von Frauen* in androgendernden maskulinen personalen Appellationen als diskriminierende Sprachhandlung
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Scalar and Counterfactual Approximatives: Investigating Heritage Greek in the USA and Germany
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
The pragmatics of surprise-disapproval questions : An empirical study
|
|
|
|
In: Linguistics Vanguard ; 8 (2022), s2. - S. 239-249. - De Gruyter. - eISSN 2199-174X (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Code-switching among Qaqet-speaking adults in Kamanakam, East New Britain Province, Papua New Guinea
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
The interpretative options of anaphoric complex demonstratives
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
In this paper, we present experimental evidence from a ‘yes’/‘no’ judgement task and two acceptability rating studies (Experiments 1a-c) for the claim made in Hinterwimmer (2019) that sentences with two anaphorically interpreted complex demonstratives are less acceptable than sentences with two anaphorically interpreted definite descriptions and sentences where one of the two previously introduced referents is picked up by a complex demonstrative, while the other one is picked up by a definite description. The results of Experiment 1a and 1b are in principle compatible with the account argued for in Hinterwimmer (2019), according to which the (potentially abstract) demonstrations presupposed by demonstratives may not have overlapping trajectories. However, sentences with two anaphorically interpreted complex demonstratives are not judged as unacceptable as would be expected if they involved a presupposition violation. Therefore, we propose an alternative, economy-based pragmatic account that builds on Ahn (2019) and Nowak (2019). The question of whether the observed pattern is more compatible with the account proposed by Hinterwimmer (2019) or the alternative pragmatic account is directly addressed in a further acceptability rating study (Experiment 1c). The design of that study is similar to that of Experiment 1b, but it includes as fillers both sentences clearly violating a presupposition and sentences violating a pragmatic constraint. Since the ratings for sentences containing two anaphorically interpreted complex demonstratives are closer to the ratings for sentences violating a pragmatic constraint than for sentences violating a presupposition, we conclude that the alternative pragmatic account is preferable to the account by Hinterwimmer (2019).
|
|
Keyword:
ddc:150; ddc:400
|
|
URL: https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/61101/ https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.5700 https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/61101/1/glossa-5700-hinterwimmer.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
12 |
Semantic-role prominence is contingent on referent prominence in discourse: Experimental evidence from impersonals and passives in Polish
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Ambiguity in case marking does not affect the description of transitive events in German: evidence from sentence production and eye-tracking
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Review of “The Language(s) of Politics. Multilingual policy-making in the European Union“ by Nils Ringe. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press 2022.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Speech acts in the history of English: Gaps and paths of evolution
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Questions in argumentative dialogue
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Pragmatics ; 188 (2022). - S. 56-79. - Elsevier. - ISSN 0378-2166. - eISSN 1879-1387 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Non-canonical questions from a comparative perspective : Introduction to the special collection
|
|
|
|
In: Linguistics Vanguard ; 8 (2022), s2. - S. 205-207. - De Gruyter. - eISSN 2199-174X (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
De la clivée en th- à la structure the-N-is en anglais oral: vers une lecture discursive, prosodique et dialogique
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
STATIONEN Fachsprache Kulturwissenschaften für Anfänger (A2-B1)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|