| 21 |
Overt speakers in syntax
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 6, No 1 (2021); 1 ; 2397-1835 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 22 |
Metacommunicative-why fragments as probes into the grammar of the speech act layer
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 6, No 1 (2021); 84 ; 2397-1835 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 23 |
La fijación flexiva en el estudio de las fórmulas rutinarias: el caso de mira quién habla vs. mira quién fue a hablar y mira quién va a hablar
|
|
|
|
In: Tonos Digital; NÚMERO 42 - ENERO 2022 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 24 |
LADDER. Learners' digital communication: a corpus for pragmatic competences in Italian L1/L2 ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 25 |
LADDER. Learners' digital communication: a corpus for pragmatic competences in Italian L1/L2 ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 26 |
LADDER. Learners' digital communication: a corpus for pragmatic competences in Italian L1/L2 ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 27 |
Γλώσσα και ιδεολογία στους πολιτικούς λόγους Η περίπτωση του Μουσσολίνι ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 28 |
Can Speech Act Theory Save Notice Pleading?
|
|
|
|
In: Indiana Law Journal (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 29 |
¿Qué me recomiendas? Teaching the Pragmatics of Recommendations
|
|
|
|
In: IULC Working Papers; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2021): Special Volume on Teaching of Pragmatics ; 1524-2110 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 30 |
Investigating the Communicative Functions of Interrogative Sentences in Dialogue Texts
|
|
|
|
In: Media Watch ; 11 ; 3 ; 488-501 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 31 |
The `traiterous' and `unfitting' words in Ireland's 1641 depositions: the legal, social, violent, and emotional implications of language
|
|
Hoffman, Grace. - : Trinity College Dublin. School of Histories & Humanities. Discipline of History, 2021
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 32 |
El discurso argumentativo en los primeros cursos de la enseñanza superior
|
|
|
|
In: TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa) (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 33 |
It’s the ideology stupid! The securitisation of extremism by Prime Ministers in the United Kingdom from 1997 to 2016.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 34 |
Atos de fala e estratégias de delicadeza no desenvolvimento da competência pragmática de alunos de Português Língua Não Materna no contexto de ensino alemão
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 35 |
Communicative Intentions Annotation Scheme for Natural Language Generation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 36 |
El discurso argumentativo en los primeros cursos de la enseñanza superior
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 37 |
An Instrumental Theory of Speech Acts
|
|
|
|
In: Theses and Dissertations (2021)
|
|
Abstract:
In this paper I present a theory of speech acts with two parts: an account of the normativity of speech acts and a method for individuating them. The first part holds that instrumental rationality gives speech acts normative force. I have in mind a simple kind of means-end normativity—given that a speaker has a desire to φ, she has an instrumental reason to adopt the appropriate means to φ. When we perform speech acts, we take part in linguistic conventions. In doing so, our desires interact with those conventions in ways that generate speech-act-specific instrumental reasons for us. For example, when I make a promise, the act of promising generates a new instrumental reason for me to follow through on that promise. This is because if I don’t, I will be liable for sanctions like blame. Since I don’t want to be liable for blame, I have a reason to keep my promise. The second part of the theory holds that we should distinguish speech acts by their normative properties—the kinds of instrumental reasons they generate for the speaker. I argue that two speech acts token distinct act types just in case they differ in the kind of instrumental reasons they generate for the speaker. For example, I argue that promises, oaths, and vows are the same act type because they generate the same kind of reason to follow through. What results is a new way of taxonomizing speech acts. I call this the Instrumental theory of speech acts, or Instrumentalism.
|
|
Keyword:
Assertion; Instrumentalism; Normativity; Philosophy; Promising; Speech acts; Threats
|
|
URL: https://dc.uwm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3666&context=etd
https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/2661
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 38 |
Corpus Pragmatics and Multimodality: Compiling an ad-hoc Multimodal Corpus for EFL Pragmatics Teaching
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 39 |
Tell Me Everything You Know: A Conversation Update System for the Rational Speech Acts Framework
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 40 |
Modalized speech acts in a spoken learner corpus: The case of can and could
|
|
|
|
In: Topics in Linguistics, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 27-37 (2021) (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
