DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1...273 274 275 276 277
Hits 5.521 – 5.534 of 5.534

5521
Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies among Iranian EFL Learners in an “Input-poor ” Environment
In: http://www.issr-journals.org/links/papers.php?application%3Dpdf%26article%3DIJIAS-14-093-11%26journal%3Dijias
BASE
Show details
5522
©ARC Page | 100 The Effect of Summarizing Short Stories on Iranian EFL Learners ’ Vocabulary Learning
In: http://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijsell/v2-i9/13.pdf
BASE
Show details
5523
The Memory Promoting Effect of Smiling Face in Face Cognition
In: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/viewFile/2251/2101/
BASE
Show details
5524
Metacognitive Strategy Instruction as a Means to Improve Listening Self- Efficacy among Iranian Undergraduate Learners of English
In: http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2015_1_9.pdf
BASE
Show details
5525
Interactions between Learning and Evolution: The Outstanding Strategy Generated by the
In: http://www2.create.human.nagoya-u.ac.jp/publication/2004/biosystems_rsuzuki.pdf
BASE
Show details
5526
A Randomized Experiment of a Cognitive Strategies Approach to Text-Based Analytical Writing for Mainstreamed Latino English Language Learners in Grades 6-12
In: http://www.ics.uci.edu/%7Edvd/Research/11-jree-preprint.pdf
BASE
Show details
5527
Politeness: Is there an East-West Divide? � � � �
In: http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/staff/geoff/leech2006politeness.pdf
BASE
Show details
5528
Decision Making in Multi-Issue e-Market Auction Using Fuzzy Techniques and Negotiable Attitudes
In: http://www.jtaer.com/aug2008/goyal_lu_zhang_p8.pdf
BASE
Show details
5529
Linguistically quantified thresholding strategies for text categorization
In: http://www.eusflat.org/publications/proceedings/EUSFLAT_2003/papers/03Zadrozny.pdf
BASE
Show details
5530
CUHK Experiments with ImageCLEF 2005 ∗
In: http://clef.isti.cnr.it/2005/working_notes/workingnotes2005/hoi05.pdf
BASE
Show details
5531
Immigration, Literacy, and Mobility: A Critical Ethnographic Study of Well-educated Chinese Immigrants’ Trajectories in Canada
Wang, Lurong. - NO_RESTRICTION
BASE
Show details
5532
Epistemic and evidential marking in discourse: effects of register and debatability
Abstract: The use of evidential and epistemic marking as a rhetorical strategy has received little attention in the literature. Speakers often make judgments on the basis of perceptual, reported, or inferred evidence, thus the relationship between epistemicity and evidentiality is often close and difficult to demarcate. However, whereas epistemicity involves the speaker's or writer's evaluation, judgment and degree of commitment attached to the truth-value of a piece of information, evidentiality involves the speaker's or writer's assertion of the source and kind of evidence at their disposal (De Haan, 2001, 2005; Mushin, 2001; Nuyts, 2005). Both of these semantic notions have been thoroughly dealt with in regard to morphosyntactic, lexical and grammatical marking, but relatively little has been investigated in pragmatic and textual terms. The present study approaches the indexing of epistemicity and evidentiality from the point of view of register by analyzing a total of 30 oral and 30 written productions of two opinion reports (one dealing with a debatable issue and the other with a non-debatable issue) produced by 15 Catalan speakers. The main aim of the paper is to test the potential effects of register (i.e., oral vs. written discourse) and debatability (i.e., debatable vs. nondebatable issue) on the discourse marking of evidentiality and epistemicity. With respect to the effects of register, results confirm that the use of both epistemic and evidential markers is significantly higher in the oral than in the written reports, and specifically the use of low certainty epistemic markers and direct evidential markers. With respect to the effects of debatability, results show that there is a more profuse use of epistemics than evidentials in the debatable than in the nondebatable condition, and specifically the use of low certainty markers and common knowledge and reported evidential markers. In general, these results support the view that register and debatability are two important factors that condition the use of evidentiality and epistemicity in the construction of discourse epistemic stance. ; A preliminary version of this paper was presented at the conferences The Nature of Evidentiality 2012 (Leiden, June 13-15, 2012), and Modality, Corpus, Discourse (Lund, June 7-8, 2012). We would like to thank participants at those meetings, especially Johan Rooryk, Monica Lau, Margaret Speas, Carita Paradis and Jan Nuyts, for their helpful comments. We also acknowledge the technical assistance given by Maria Dolors Cañada at the Universitat Pompeu Fabra in the Atlas.ti. procedure to analyze our data. This research has been supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICINN; research grants FFI2011-25755 and FFI2009-07648) as part of the project ‘‘Epistemic modality, evidentiality and grammaticality. Inter- and intralinguistic contrastive analysis in oral and written discourse [MODEVIG]’’ and by a grant awarded by the Generalitat de Catalunya to the Grup d’Estudis de Prosòdia (2009SGR-701).
Keyword: Epistemicity; Evidentiality; Oral discourse; Rhetorical strategy; Stance; Written discourse
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.008
http://hdl.handle.net/10230/28099
BASE
Hide details
5533
Influence of multiprofessional work on the production of care and access to primary health care
In: Revista CEFAC, Vol 20, Iss 3, Pp 342-352
BASE
Show details
5534
Job satisfaction and dissatisfaction among family health strategy professionals in a small city of Southern Brazil
In: Revista CEFAC, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 69-78
BASE
Show details

Page: 1...273 274 275 276 277

Catalogues
629
0
1.218
0
0
2
0
Bibliographies
3.915
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
1.605
2
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern