| 1 |
An inquiry into the development of critical text creators: Teaching grammar in the primary years ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Exploring How a University Mathematics Teacher’s Digital Relational Competence Can Be Manifested: A Micro-Analytical Study
|
|
|
|
In: Education Sciences; Volume 12; Issue 4; Pages: 257 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Primary Pupils’ Multimodal Representations in Worksheets—Text Work in Science Education
|
|
|
|
In: Education Sciences; Volume 12; Issue 3; Pages: 221 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Bots on Twitter: Evaluative Analysis on non-authentic tweets ; Bots no Twitter: Análise Avaliativa de tweets não autênticos
|
|
|
|
In: Entrepalavras; v. 11, n. 3 (11): Linguagem e Tecnologia; 502-525 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
The processes in the activity of writing: evidence from collaborative writing ; Os processos na atividade de escrita: estudo com base na escrita colaborativa
|
|
|
|
In: Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; Vol 44 No 1 (2022): Jan.-June; e57804 ; Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; v. 44 n. 1 (2022): Jan.-June; e57804 ; 1983-4683 ; 1983-4675 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Systemic Functional Linguistics and Its Application to the Study of Academic Conference Presentations
|
|
|
|
In: World Languages Faculty Publications and Presentations (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Developing Language Learners’ Use of Appraisal for Argumentative Writing: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Approach ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
A genre-based investigation of Introduction and Method sections of research articles in clinical psychology: a systemic-functional perspective
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
O ensino de espanhol em contexto tecnológico : uma reflexão metodológica orientada pela Pedagogia de Gêneros da LSF
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Un modelo para integrar lenguaje y conocimiento del mundo: aprender a través de la lengua ; A model for integrating language and knowledge of the world: learning through language
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
One step at a time: Aligning theory and practice in a tertiary embedding initiative
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Supporting Vietnamese EFL university students’ development of argumentative writing through Systemic Functional Linguistics-based genre pedagogy
|
|
|
|
In: University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 2017+ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Australia's National Tobacco Campaign: Discourse and Change over Two Decades
|
|
Mallet, Aurélie Marie Beatrice. - : The University of Sydney, 2021. : Department of Linguistics, 2021. : Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, School of Literature, Art and Media, 2021
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Developing Language Learners’ Use of Appraisal for Argumentative Writing: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Approach
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Evaluation and instruction in PhD examiners' reports: How grammatical choices construe examiner roles
|
|
|
|
In: Linguistics and Education (2020)
|
|
Abstract:
One of the principal roles of a PhD examiner is to judge ‘both the potential of the researcher and the quality of the research’ (Holbrook, Bourke, Fairbairn, & Lovat, 2014, p. 986). While examiners may be guided by criteria supplied by universities, the descriptors they are provided with can often be open to interpretation. Interpreting an examiner's report can present a challenge to students and their supervisors, exacerbated by the often ambiguous use of language in the reports. This article examines the discourses of evaluation and instruction in 142 PhD examiners’ reports on theses submitted at an Australasian university. The paper draws on systemic functional linguistics, in particular transitivity (Halliday & Matthiessen, 2014), in order to examine the reports. The study revealed that examiners can adopt up to 10 “roles” in their reports, each of which can be co-present in a single report. The inability to differentiate between these roles, we argue, is potentially frustrating for the audience of the reports (candidates, supervisors, departmental heads, etc.), particularly when interpreting whether a comment in the text represents an evaluation, an instruction, or an aside. By revealing these multiple, yet co-present, roles in examiners’ reports and their associated linguistic realisations, we hope to raise examiners’ awareness of the implications of the language they use when writing their reports as well as draw thesis supervisor and institutional attention to the ambiguities inherent in this underexplored genre ; The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Australian Research Council Discovery Project DP110103007 in supporting the project that produced the data examined in this article.
|
|
Keyword:
Discourse analysis; Examiners’ reports; Grammatical choices; Language of evaluation; Mood; PhD thesis; Roles; Systemic functional linguistics; Theme; Transitivity
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/218023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.07.008
https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/218023/3/1-s2.0-S0898589817300050-main.pdf.jpg
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Developing discourse structure analysis for use on conversations that include people with aphasia
|
|
|
|
In: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1594159643173734 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
News Media Representation of The Dakota Access Pipeline Protest (A Study Using Systemic Functional Linguistics)
|
|
|
|
In: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1594292005011941 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
