7 |
The limited role of number of nested syntactic dependencies in accounting for processing cost : evidence from German simplex and complex verbal clusters
|
|
Bader, Markus [Verfasser]. - Frankfurt am Main : Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg, 2018
|
|
DNB Subject Category Language
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Constraints on Argument Linearization in German
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 3, No 1 (2018); 6 ; 2397-1835 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
The Limited Role of Number of Nested Syntactic Dependencies in Accounting for Processing Cost: Evidence from German Simplex and Complex Verbal Clusters
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Personal Pronouns and D-Pronouns in German: Connecting Comprehension to Production ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Filling the prefield : Findings and challenges
|
|
|
|
In: Two perspectives on V2 : The invited talks of the DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences” / Freitag, Constantin; Bott, Oliver; Schlotterbeck, Fabian (Hrsg.). - Konstanz : University of Konstanz, 2017. - S. 27-49 (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Structural priming of SO vs. OS in German: Clauses with psychological verbs as a test case
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
The Effect of Clause Type on Long Extraction in German
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Long extraction is the movement of a phrase over a clausal boundary. Although long extraction into embedded clauses used to be acceptable in previous stages of German, it is considered to be unacceptable in Modern German. In this paper, we first review experimental evidence from our ongoing investigation of long extraction in Modern German. We then present a new experiment which compares the acceptability of the four major types of long extraction: long topicalization, long extraction into comparative clauses, embedded wh-questions and relative clauses. In accordance with the prior literature, the results indicate that long extraction is of marginal acceptability in Modern German. Long extraction into comparative clauses was found to be most acceptable, followed by embedded wh-questions. Long extraction into relative clauses and long topicalization received the lowest acceptability ratings. Overall, the results show that long extraction into embedded clauses is no less acceptable than long extraction into main clauses. The experimental findings are corroborated by observations from a corpus study.
|
|
Keyword:
400; 430; Acceptability; Linguistik; Long extraction; Modern German; Relative clauses; Topicalization
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.15496/publikation-19041 http://hdl.handle.net/10900/77640 http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-dspace-776405
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
19 |
Personal Pronouns and D-Pronouns in German: Connecting Comprehension to Production
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|