22 |
Language education policy and practice in East and Southeast Asia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
24 |
Language education policy and practice in East and Southeast Asia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
25 |
Interpretation and critical reflection in intercultural language learning ; consequences of a critical perspective for the teaching and learning of pragmatics
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
26 |
Reconceptualising Learning in Transdisciplinary Languages Education
|
|
|
|
In: Scarino, Angela; & Liddicoat, Anthony J.(2016). Reconceptualising Learning in Transdisciplinary Languages Education. L2 Journal, 8(4). doi:10.5070/L28429918. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1247d08d (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
28 |
Reconceptualising learning in transdisciplinary languages education
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
29 |
Language planning in universities : teaching, research and administration
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
30 |
Native and non-native speaker identities in interaction : trajectories of power
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
31 |
Multilingual education : the role of language ideologies and attitudes
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
32 |
Multilingualism research in Anglophone contexts as a discursive construction of multilingual practice
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
33 |
The interface between macro and micro-level language policy and the place of language pedagogies
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This paper investigates the place of pedagogy in language-in-education policy through an analysis of how the macro-level of government policy interacts with the micro-level of local educational practice. It argues that pedagogy is typically considered a micro-level activity and policy frequently devolves decision-making about pedagogy to micro-level agents. For this reason, pedagogy is often invisible in policy texts. Pedagogy becomes a concern for macro-level policy when micro-level practice is constructed as being a problem and policy seeks to intervene to reform practice. However, whether pedagogy is explicitly discussed in policy, it remains nonetheless relevant for policy implementation and ultimately for the success of policy change. The silence about pedagogy in policy texts may render invisible the capacity for pedagogical change at the micro-level and the capabilities and resources needed to effect change. The paper will examine these issues through an investigation of a series of language policy contexts in which pedagogy is either an explicit concern or it remains implicit.
|
|
Keyword:
LB Theory and practice of education; P Philology. Linguistics
|
|
URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/87472/1/WRAP-interface-macro-micro-policy-Liddicoat-2017.pdf http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/87472/ https://doi.org/10.1080/18334105.2014.11082025
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
34 |
The meaning of accuracy and culture, and the rise of the machine in interpreting and translation. A conversation between Sandra Hale and Anthony Liddicoat
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
35 |
Intercultural mediation, intercultural communication and translation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
36 |
Educational equity for linguistically marginalised students
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
40 |
Micro-language planning for multilingual education: Agency in local contexts
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|