1 |
XFORMAL: A Benchmark for Multilingual Formality Style Transfer ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Evaluating the Evaluation Metrics for Style Transfer: A Case Study in Multilingual Formality Transfer ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Rhetoric, Logic, and Dialectic: Advancing Theory-based Argument Quality Assessment in Natural Language Processing ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
The ApposCorpus: A new multilingual, multi-domain dataset for factual appositive generation ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Predicting Declension Class from Form and Meaning
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
The Paradigm Discovery Problem
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
A Tale of a Probe and a Parser
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2020)
|
|
Abstract:
Measuring what linguistic information is encoded in neural models of language has become popular in NLP. Researchers approach this enterprise by training “probes”—supervised models designed to extract linguistic structure from another model’s output. One such probe is the structural probe (Hewitt and Manning, 2019), designed to quantify the extent to which syntactic information is encoded in contextualised word representations. The structural probe has a novel design, unattested in the parsing literature, the precise benefit of which is not immediately obvious. To explore whether syntactic probes would do better to make use of existing techniques, we compare the structural probe to a more traditional parser with an identical lightweight parameterisation. The parser outperforms structural probe on UUAS in seven of nine analysed languages, often by a substantial amount (e.g. by 11.1 points in English). Under a second less common metric, however, there is the opposite trend—the structural probe outperforms the parser. This begs the question: which metric should we prefer?
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000462303 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/462303
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
9 |
A Corpus for Large-Scale Phonetic Typology
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structure
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
It’s Easier to Translate out of English than into it: Measuring Neural Translation Difficulty by Cross-Mutual Information
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
ASSET: A dataset for tuning and evaluation of sentence simplification models with multiple rewriting transformations
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Non-linear instance-based cross-lingual mapping for non-isomorphic embedding spaces
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Classification-based self-learning for weakly supervised bilingual lexicon induction
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
On the limitations of cross-lingual encoders as exposed by reference-free machine translation evaluation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Enabling Robust Grammatical Error Correction in New Domains: Data Sets, Metrics, and Analyses
|
|
|
|
In: Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Vol 7, Pp 551-566 (2019) (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Dear Sir or Madam, May I introduce the GYAFC Dataset: Corpus, Benchmarks and Metrics for Formality Style Transfer ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Oracle and human baselines for native language identification
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|