1 |
Behavioral Activation and Depression Symptomatology: Longitudinal Assessment of Linguistic Indicators in Text-Based Therapy Sessions
|
|
|
|
In: J Med Internet Res (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Improving allergy documentation: A retrospective electronic health record system-wide patient safety initiative
|
|
|
|
In: J Patient Saf (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Leveraging Linguistic Context in Dyadic Interactions to Improve Automatic Speech Recognition for Children
|
|
|
|
In: Comput Speech Lang (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Writing persuasive texts: using grammatical metaphors for rhetorical purposes in an educational context
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Younger and Older Adults’ Lie-Detection and Credibility Judgments of Children’s Coached Reports
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
The Knowledge Quartet: A 'Fresh Lens' in the Analysis of Teachers' Classroom Practice
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Vocabulary of 2-Year-Olds Learning English and an Additional Language: Norms and Effects of Linguistic Distance
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Children’s Conversational Memory Regarding a Minor Transgression and a Subsequent Interview
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
VOCABULARY OF 2-YEAR-OLDS LEARNING ENGLISH AND AN ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE: NORMS AND EFFECTS OF LINGUISTIC DISTANCE
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Ask versus Tell: Potential Confusion When Child Witnesses are Questioned about Conversations
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Pragmatic Failure and Referential Ambiguity when Attorneys Ask Child Witnesses “Do You Know/Remember” Questions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Using SFL to Personalise Learning in Early Childhood Classrooms
|
|
Thomas, D. - : The Organising Committee of the 44th International Systemic Functional Congress, 2017
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Examining interpersonal metaphor of modality in successful primary persuasive texts
|
|
To, V; Thomas, D. - : The Organising Committee of the 44th International Systemic Functional Congress, 2017
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Translation Regulation of the Glutamyl-prolyl-tRNA Synthetase Gene EPRS through Bypass of Upstream Open Reading Frames with Noncanonical Initiation Codons
|
|
|
|
In: PMC (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Attorney Questions Predict Jury-eligible Adult Assessments of Attorneys, Child Witnesses, and Defendant Guilt
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Children are often the primary source of evidence in maltreatment cases, particularly cases of child sexual abuse, and may be asked to testify in court. Although best-practice protocols for interviewing children suggest that interviewers ask open-ended questions to elicit detailed responses from children, during in-court testimony, attorneys tend to rely on closed-ended questions that elicit simple (often “yes” or “no”) responses (e.g., Andrews, Lamb, & Lyon, 2015; Klemfuss, Quas, & Lyon, 2014). How then are jurors making decisions about children’s credibility and ultimately the case outcome? The present study examined the effect of two attorney-specific factors (e.g., temporal structure and questioning phase) on mock jurors’ perceptions of attorney performance, child witness credibility, storyline clarity, and defendant guilt. Participants were randomly assigned to read a trial excerpt from one of eight conditions and were then asked to evaluate the attorney, child witness, and the case. Selected excerpts were from criminal court case transcripts and contained either high attorney temporal structure (e.g., use of temporal markers) or low temporal structure (e.g., frequent topic switching), involved direct or cross-examination, and represented cases resulting in a conviction or acquittal. Child responses were kept consistent across all excerpts. Results showed that participants perceived the attorney’s performance and child’s credibility more favorably and thought the storyline was clearer when attorneys provided high rather than low temporal structure and when the excerpt contained direct rather than cross-examination. Participants who read a direct rather than cross-examination excerpt were also more likely to think the defendant was guilty. The study highlights the impact of attorney questioning style on mock jurors’ perceptions. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7098266/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26932420 https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2214
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
20 |
Nominalisation in high scoring primary and secondary persuasive texts
|
|
To, V; Thomas, D. - : Australian Systemic Functional Linguistics Association (ASFLA), 2016
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|