22 |
CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS FOR LANGUAGE STUDENTS
|
|
|
|
In: TEFLIN Journal, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 32-47 (2013) (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
23 |
CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS FOR LANGUAGE STUDENTS
|
|
|
|
In: TEFLIN Journal, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 32-47 (2013) (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
25 |
Κριτικός γλωσσικός γραμματισμός και διδασκαλία της γλώσσας στα Σχολεία Δεύτερης Ευκαιρίας: μία μελέτη περίπτωσης ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
26 |
A word in the hand ; supporting critical literacy through a discourse analysis of fantasy, canonical, and nonfiction texts
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Performing systemic functional linguistics (SFL) analysis with students instead of just on students or at students empowers students to not only use language, but also critique it so as to become more critically aware citizens. However, conceptualizing grammar as a way to support critical literacy and expose ideology and hegemony has not been fully explored as a way of teaching language in American classrooms (Love, 2006). With this in mind, this study investigated how instructional use of SFL analytic resources in subject English supported secondary-level students in recognizing how language positions people to think and behave in particular ways as they read various texts and used the linguistic tools. The study explored how students responded to using linguistic tools such as the appraisal system (Martin & Rose, 2003) as well as modality and identification analyses (Halliday, 1994) that made visible the ways in which language positioned people to think and behave in a particular ways, empowering some while leading others to accept their own disempowerment. The study investigated students’ differing experiences and levels of confidence in performing SFL with various genres, looked for evidence of critical growth and language awareness in student dialogue, as well as examined if critical growth and writing development was reflected in student writing. This investigation provided meaningful data as to how SFL analysis tools aided secondary students in recognizing ways in which language positions people to think and behave, discussing authors’ manipulation of language and linguistic choices, and supporting or refuting claims when discussing critical issues present in each text. Furthermore, students’ reactions to the instructional use of SFL when analyzing fantasy, canonical, and non-fiction texts may assist researchers and educators in developing a curriculum that utilizes SFL to help “broaden students’ ability to use language more expertly across a variety of social and academic contexts” (Gebhard, Harman, & Seger, 2007, p. 421). ; PhD ; Language and Literacy Education ; English Education ; James Marshall ; James Marshall ; Ruth Harman ; Jobeth Allen
|
|
Keyword:
Critical Discourse Analysis; Critical Language Awareness; Critical Literacy; Language Instruction; Secondary English Education; Systemic Functional Linguistics
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10724/28604 http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/simmons_amber_m_201212_phd
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
27 |
Learners' Identity Negotiations and Beliefs about Pronunciation in Study Abroad Contexts
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
28 |
Learners' Identity Negotiations and Beliefs about Pronunciation in Study Abroad Contexts
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
30 |
Critical language awareness in foreign language learning
|
|
|
|
In: Literatura y Lingüística, Iss 16, Pp 211-222 (2005) (2005)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
31 |
Cross-cultural Understanding: A Dilemma for TEFL
|
|
|
|
In: TEFLIN Journal, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 82-110 (2003) (2003)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
32 |
Sprachreflexivität im parlamentarischen Diskurs : eine korpuslinguistische Untersuchung anhand von Bundestagsdebatten (1973 - 1989) zum Thema "Einwanderung"
|
|
|
|
BLLDB
|
|
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
|
|
Show details
|
|
33 |
1996: Why we still need critical language awareness in South Africa
|
|
|
|
In: Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, Vol 29, Iss 0, Pp 172-190 (1996) (1996)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|