Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9... 691
81 |
Zebrafish larvae exploration and aversive chemotaxis dataset ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
82 |
Asking It All: Generating Contextualized Questions for any Semantic Role ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
83 |
International Centre for Language and Communicative Development: A Computational Model of the Acquisition of German Case, 2014-2020 ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
84 |
Zebrafish larvae exploration and aversive chemotaxis dataset ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
85 |
Weakly Supervised Named Entity Tagging with Learnable Logical Rules ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
86 |
Journal titles and mission statements – Lexical structure, diversity and readability in business, management and accounting research ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
87 |
Systematic review of interventions to increase the use of arteriovenous fistulae and grafts in incident haemodialysis patients ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
88 |
Systematic review of interventions to increase the use of arteriovenous fistulae and grafts in incident haemodialysis patients ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
89 |
A Comparison of Acoustic and Linguistics Methodologies for Alzheimer's Dementia Recognition
|
|
|
|
In: http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/284990 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
90 |
Utterance Verification-Based Dysarthric Speech Intelligibility Assessment Using Phonetic Posterior Features
|
|
|
|
In: http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/284148 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
91 |
How Bilingual Novelists Utilize their Linguistic Knowledge: Towards a Typology of the Contemporary ‘Modern Languages Novel’ in English
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
92 |
How Bilingual Novelists Utilize their Linguistic Knowledge: Towards a Typology of the Contemporary ‘Modern Languages Novel’ in English
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
93 |
Ideologías del Contacto Lingüístico en la ciudad de Oaxaca, México
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
94 |
Chinese international students’ participation in the oracy demands of British higher education
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
95 |
The clinical relevance of formal thought disorder in the early stages of psychosis: results from the PRONIA study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
96 |
Destination-language acquisition of recently arrived immigrants : Do refugees differ from other immigrants? ; Spracherwerb von Neuzuwanderern : Unterscheiden sich Geflüchtete von anderen Migranten?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
97 |
Annotation and initial evaluation of a large annotated German oncological corpus
|
|
|
|
In: JAMIA Open (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
98 |
The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence
|
|
Page, Matthew J.; Moher, David; Fidler, Fiona M.; Higgins, Julian P. T.; Brennan, Sue E.; Haddaway, Neal R.; Hamilton, Daniel G.; Kanukula, Raju; Karunananthan, Sathya; Maxwell, Lara J.; McDonald, Steve; Nakagawa, Shinichi; Nunan, David; Tugwell, Peter; Welch, Vivian A.; McKenzie, Joanne E.
|
|
In: Syst Rev (2021)
|
|
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Investigations of transparency, reproducibility and replicability in science have been directed largely at individual studies. It is just as critical to explore these issues in syntheses of studies, such as systematic reviews, given their influence on decision-making and future research. We aim to explore various aspects relating to the transparency, reproducibility and replicability of several components of systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of health, social, behavioural and educational interventions. METHODS: The REPRISE (REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence) project consists of four studies. We will evaluate the completeness of reporting and sharing of review data, analytic code and other materials in a random sample of 300 systematic reviews of interventions published in 2020 (Study 1). We will survey authors of systematic reviews to explore their views on sharing review data, analytic code and other materials and their understanding of and opinions about replication of systematic reviews (Study 2). We will then evaluate the extent of variation in results when we (a) independently reproduce meta-analyses using the same computational steps and analytic code (if available) as used in the original review (Study 3), and (b) crowdsource teams of systematic reviewers to independently replicate a subset of methods (searches for studies, selection of studies for inclusion, collection of outcome data, and synthesis of results) in a sample of the original reviews; 30 reviews will be replicated by 1 team each and 2 reviews will be replicated by 15 teams (Study 4). DISCUSSION: The REPRISE project takes a systematic approach to determine how reliable systematic reviews of interventions are. We anticipate that results of the REPRISE project will inform strategies to improve the conduct and reporting of future systematic reviews. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01670-0.
|
|
Keyword:
Protocol
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33863381 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052676/ https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01670-0
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
99 |
Fast and accurate annotation of acoustic signals with deep neural networks
|
|
|
|
In: eLife (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
100 |
Radically open dialectical behaviour therapy adapted for adolescents: a case series
|
|
|
|
In: BMC Psychiatry (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9... 691
|
|