1 |
Differential effects of working memory load on priming and recognition of real images
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
From short-term store to multicomponent working memory: The role of the modal model
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Multiple high-reward items can be prioritized in working memory but with greater vulnerability to interference
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Competition for the focus of attention in visual working memory: perceptual recency versus executive control
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Visual feature binding in younger and older adults: Encoding and suffix interference effects
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Executive control of stimulus-driven and goal-directed attention in visual working memory
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
What does visual suffix interference tell us about spatial location in working memory?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Executive and perceptual attention play different roles in visual working memory: Evidence from suffix and strategy effects
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Benefit of enactment over oral repetition of verbal instruction does not require additional working memory during encoding
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
For this research, we used a dual-task approach to investigate the involvement of working memory in following written instructions. In two experiments, participants read instructions to perform a series of actions on objects and then recalled the instructions either by spoken repetition or performance of the action sequence. Participants engaged in concurrent articulatory suppression, backward-counting, and spatial-tapping tasks during the presentation of the instructions, in order to disrupt the phonological-loop, central-executive, and visuospatial-sketchpad components of working memory, respectively. Recall accuracy was substantially disrupted by all three concurrent tasks, indicating that encoding and retaining verbal instructions depends on multiple components of working memory. The accuracy of recalling the instructions was greater when the actions were performed than when the instructions were repeated, and this advantage was unaffected by the concurrent tasks, suggesting that the benefit of enactment over oral repetition does not cost additional working memory resources
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0471-7 http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/81569/12/Benefit%20of%20enactment%20over%20oral%20repetition%20of%20verbal%20instruction%20does%20not%20require%20additional%20working%20memory%20during%20encoding.pdf http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/81569/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|