DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 10 of 10

1
Differential effects of working memory load on priming and recognition of real images
Castellà, J; Pina, R; Baqués, J. - : Springer Nature, 2020
BASE
Show details
2
From short-term store to multicomponent working memory: The role of the modal model
Baddeley, AD; Hitch, GJ; Allen, RJ. - : Springer US, 2019
BASE
Show details
3
Multiple high-reward items can be prioritized in working memory but with greater vulnerability to interference
Allen, RJ; Ueno, T. - : Springer US, 2018
BASE
Show details
4
Competition for the focus of attention in visual working memory: perceptual recency versus executive control
Hitch, GJ; Hu, Y; Allen, RJ. - : Wiley, 2018
BASE
Show details
5
Cross-modal working memory binding and L1-L2 word learning
Allen, RJ; Wang, S; Li, P. - : Springer Verlag, 2017
BASE
Show details
6
Visual feature binding in younger and older adults: Encoding and suffix interference effects
Brown, LA; Niven, EH; Logie, RH. - : Taylor & Francis, 2017
BASE
Show details
7
Executive control of stimulus-driven and goal-directed attention in visual working memory
Hu, Y; Allen, RJ; Baddeley, AD. - : Springer Verlag, 2016
BASE
Show details
8
What does visual suffix interference tell us about spatial location in working memory?
Allen, RJ; Castellà, J; Ueno, T. - : Springer US, 2015
BASE
Show details
9
Executive and perceptual attention play different roles in visual working memory: Evidence from suffix and strategy effects
Hu, Y; Hitch, GJ; Baddeley, AD. - : American Psychological Association, 2014
BASE
Show details
10
Benefit of enactment over oral repetition of verbal instruction does not require additional working memory during encoding
Yang, T; Gathercole, SE; Allen, RJ. - : Springer Verlag, 2014
Abstract: For this research, we used a dual-task approach to investigate the involvement of working memory in following written instructions. In two experiments, participants read instructions to perform a series of actions on objects and then recalled the instructions either by spoken repetition or performance of the action sequence. Participants engaged in concurrent articulatory suppression, backward-counting, and spatial-tapping tasks during the presentation of the instructions, in order to disrupt the phonological-loop, central-executive, and visuospatial-sketchpad components of working memory, respectively. Recall accuracy was substantially disrupted by all three concurrent tasks, indicating that encoding and retaining verbal instructions depends on multiple components of working memory. The accuracy of recalling the instructions was greater when the actions were performed than when the instructions were repeated, and this advantage was unaffected by the concurrent tasks, suggesting that the benefit of enactment over oral repetition does not cost additional working memory resources
URL: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0471-7
http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/81569/12/Benefit%20of%20enactment%20over%20oral%20repetition%20of%20verbal%20instruction%20does%20not%20require%20additional%20working%20memory%20during%20encoding.pdf
http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/81569/
BASE
Hide details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
10
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern