DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 12 of 12

1
"Laughing at you or with you": The Role of Sarcasm in Shaping the Disagreement Space ...
BASE
Show details
2
Figurative Language in Recognizing Textual Entailment ...
BASE
Show details
3
$R^3$: Reverse, Retrieve, and Rank for Sarcasm Generation with Commonsense Knowledge ...
BASE
Show details
4
An Exploratory Study of Argumentative Writing by Young Students: A Transformer-based Approach ...
BASE
Show details
5
Interpreting Verbal Irony: Linguistic Strategies and the Connection to the Type of Semantic Incongruity ...
Ghosh, Debanjan; Musi, Elena; Upasani, Kartikeya. - : University of Mass Amherst, 2020
BASE
Show details
6
Interpreting Verbal Irony: Linguistic Strategies and the Connection to the Type of Semantic Incongruity
BASE
Show details
7
Interpreting Verbal Irony: Linguistic Strategies and the Connection to the Type of Semantic Incongruity
In: Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (2020)
BASE
Show details
8
Interpreting Verbal Irony: Linguistic Strategies and the Connection to the Type of Semantic Incongruity ...
BASE
Show details
9
Sarcasm Analysis using Conversation Context ...
BASE
Show details
10
ChangeMyView Through Concessions: Do Concessions Increase Persuasion? ...
BASE
Show details
11
ChangeMyView Through Concessions: Do Concessions Increase Persuasion?
In: Dialogue & Discourse; Vol 9 No 1 (2018); 107-127 ; 2152-9620 (2018)
Abstract: In Discourse Studies concessions are considered among those argumentative strategies that increase persuasion. We aim to empirically test this hypothesis by calculating the distribution of argumentative concessions in persuasive vs. non-persuasive comments from the the ChangeMyView subreddit. This constitutes a challenging task since concessions do not always bear an argumentative role and are expressed through polysemous lexical markers. Drawing from a theoretically-informed typology of concessions, we first conduct a crowdsourcing task to label a set of polysemous lexical markers as introducing an argumentative concession relation or not. Second, we present a self-training method to automatically identify argumentative concessions using linguistically motivated features. While we achieve a moderate F1 of 57.4% via the self-training method, our subsequent error analysis highlights that the self training method is able to generalize and identify other types of concessions that are argumentative, but were not considered in the annotation guidelines. Our findings from the manual labeling and the classification experiments indicate that the type of argumentative concessions we investigated is almost equally likely to be used in winning and losing arguments. While this result seems to contradict theoretical assumptions, we provide some reasons related to the ChangeMyView subreddit.
URL: https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/dad/article/view/10736
https://doi.org/10.5087/dad.2018.104
BASE
Hide details
12
#Criming and #Alive: Network and Content Analysis of Two Sides of a Story on Twitter
In: Faculty Publications (2015)
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
12
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern