1 |
Making use of transcription data from qualitative research within a corpus-linguistic paradigm:Issues, experiences, and recommendations
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Supporting the corpus-based study of Shakespeare’s language:Enhancing a corpus of the First Folio
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
A linguistic approach to the psychosis continuum: (dis)similarities and (dis)continuities in how clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers talk about their voices ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
A linguistic approach to the psychosis continuum: (dis)similarities and (dis)continuities in how clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers talk about their voices ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Exploring and classifying the Arabic copula and auxiliary kāna via enhanced part-of-speech tagging
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
A survey of grammatical variability in Early Modern English drama
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
A linguistic approach to the psychosis continuum:(dis)similarities and (dis)continuities in how clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers talk about their voices
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Introduction: 'Continuum' approaches to psychosis have generated reports of similarities and differences in voice-hearing in clinical and non-clinical populations. Previous research has reported similarities/differences at the cohort level, but not typically examined overlap or degrees of difference between groups.Methods: We used a computer-aided linguistic approach to explore the language used to describe voice-hearing by a clinical group (Early Intervention in Psychosis service-users; N=40) and a non-clinical group (spiritualists; N=27). We identify semantic categories of terms statistically overused by one group compared with the other, and by each group compared to a control sample of non-voice-hearing interview data (log likelihood (LL) value 6.63+=p<.01; effect size measure: log ratio 1.0+). We examined relative frequencies of these terms at the individual level to consider if the dispersion of terms supports a continuum model.Results: Notwithstanding significant cohort-level differences, there were varying degrees of overlap between the groups and considerable continuity in language use. Reports of negative affect were prominent in both groups (p<.01, log ratio:1.12+). Challenges of cognitive control were also evident in both cohorts, with references to 'disengagement' accentuated in service-users (p<.01, log ratio:1.14+).Conclusion: A corpus linguistic approach to voice-hearing provides new evidence of differences between clinical and non-clinical groups. By considering variability at the individual level, we provide substantial evidence of continuity with implications for cognitive mechanisms underlying voice-hearing.
|
|
URL: https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/148617/1/Collins_et_al_A_linguistic_approach_to_the_psychosis_continuum_Accepted.pdf https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/148617/ https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2020.1842727
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
10 |
A linguistic approach to the psychosis continuum: (dis)similarities and (dis)continuities in how clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers talk about their voices
|
|
|
|
In: Cogn Neuropsychiatry (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
A linguistic approach to the psychosis continuum: (dis)similarities and (dis)continuities in how clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers talk about their voices
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
How do English translations differ from native English writings?:A multi-feature statistical model for linguistic variation analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Functional variation in the Spoken BNC2014 and the potential for register analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Approaching text typology through cluster analysis in Arabic
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|