2 |
Linguistic diversity on the EMI campus: insider accounts of the use of English and other languages in universities within Asia, Australasia, and Europe
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Where are we with linguistic diversity on international campuses?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Preschool Socio-cognitive and Language Development in the Context of the Sibling Environment
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Overseas Chinese students' perceptions of the influence of English on their language and culture
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
“Nativeness” and intelligibility: impacts of intercultural experience through English as a lingua franca on Chinese speakers’ language attitudes
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
ELF researchers take issue with 'English as a lingua franca: an immanent critique'
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Global Englishes. A resource book for students, 3rd edition
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Stigma, tensions, and apprehensions: the academic writing experience of international students
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Repositioning English and multilingualism in English as a Lingua Franca
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
ELF researchers take issue with ‘English as a lingua franca: an immanent critique’
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
ELF (English as a lingua franca) as a field of inquiry has attracted a great deal of controversy since its beginning: so critiques and responses to those critiques have been a key part of its development. The reasons for this are multiple,but it is perhaps not surprising given ELF’s position, as Cook (2012) puts it, as ‘the disobedient child of two rather reactionary academic parents, variationist sociolinguistics . and EFL pedagogic theory’ (2012: 244), and the opposition to many established conventions that such a position entails. O’Regan’s (2014) article thus represents a long tradition of critiques of ELF, which are too numerous to mention here, although it is worth pointing out that the better informed ones are rather less uniformly unconstructive than O’Regan’s. In this brief response(for a more detailed discussion see Jenkins and Baker in press), we will focus on just two of the many misinterpretations of ELF in O’Regan’s article: the portrayal of ELF as a static homogeneous field of inquiry, and the claim that ELF researchers have been unconcerned with ideological issues.
|
|
URL: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/375302/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
20 |
Cumulative biomedical risk and social cognition in the second year of life: prediction and moderation by responsive parenting
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|