1 |
Protocol for the development of the international population registry for aphasia after stroke (I-PRAISE)
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Dosage, intensity, and frequency of language therapy for aphasia: a systematic review–based, individual participant data network meta-analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Protocol for the development of the international population registry for aphasia after stroke (I-PRAISE)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: the RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Dosage, Intensity, and Frequency of Language Therapy for Aphasia: A Systematic Review-Based, Individual Participant Data Network Meta-Analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: the RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Predictors of poststroke aphasia recovery: a systematic review-informed individual participant data meta-analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Communicating simply, but not too simply: Reporting of participants and speech and language interventions for aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
RELEASE: A protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
RELEASE : a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
RELEASE: a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
In: Aphasiology, 2019 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Tidier descriptions of speech and language therapy interventions for people with aphasia; consensus from the release collaboration
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Tidier descriptions of speech and language therapy interventions for people with aphasia; consensus from the RELEASE collaboration
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Cross-linguistic adaptations of The Comprehensive Aphasia Test : Challenges and solutions
|
|
|
|
In: Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 29 April 2017 (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Imageability ratings across languages
|
|
|
|
In: Behavior Research Methods, 13 July 2017 (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Ratings of age of acquisition of 299 words across 25 languages: Is there a cross-linguistic order of words?
|
|
Luniewska, M.; Haman, E.; Armon-Lotem, S.; Etenkowski, B.; Southwood, F.; Andelkovic, D.; Blom, E.; Boerma, T.; Chiat, S.; de Abreu, P. E.; Gagarina, N.; Gavarro, A.; Hakansson, G.; Hickey, T.; de Lopez, K. J.; Marinis, T.; Popovic, M.; Thordardottir, E.; Blaziene, A.; Sanchenz, M. C.; Dabasinskiene, I.; Ege, P.; Ehret, I-A.; Fritsche, N-A.; Gatt, D.; Janssen, B.; Kambanaros, M.; Kapalkova, S.; Kronqvist, B.; Kunnari, S.; Levorato, C.; Nenonen, O.; Fhlannchadha, S. N.; O'Toole, C.; Polišenská, K.; Pomiechowska, B.; Ringblom, N.; Rinker, T.; Roch, M.; Savic, M.; Slancova, D.; Tsimpli, I. M.; Unal-Logacev, O.. - : SPRINGER, 2016
|
|
Abstract:
We present a new set of subjective age-of-acquisition (AoA) ratings for 299 words (158 nouns, 141 verbs) in 25 languages from five language families (Afro-Asiatic: Semitic languages; Altaic: one Turkic language: Indo-European: Baltic, Celtic, Germanic, Hellenic, Slavic, and Romance languages; Niger-Congo: one Bantu language; Uralic: Finnic and Ugric languages). Adult native speakers reported the age at which they had learned each word. We present a comparison of the AoA ratings across all languages by contrasting them in pairs. This comparison shows a consistency in the orders of ratings across the 25 languages. The data were then analyzed (1) to ascertain how the demographic characteristics of the participants influenced AoA estimations and (2) to assess differences caused by the exact form of the target question (when did you learn vs. when do children learn this word); (3) to compare the ratings obtained in our study to those of previous studies; and (4) to assess the validity of our study by comparison with quasi-objective AoA norms derived from the MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventories (MB-CDI). All 299 words were judged as being acquired early (mostly before the age of 6 years). AoA ratings were associated with the raters’ social or language status, but not with the raters’ age or education. Parents reported words as being learned earlier, and bilinguals reported learning them later. Estimations of the age at which children learn the words revealed significantly lower ratings of AoA. Finally, comparisons with previous AoA and MB-CDI norms support the validity of the present estimations. Our AoA ratings are available for research or other purposes.
|
|
Keyword:
P Philology. Linguistics
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0636-6 https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/16005/1/Luniewska,%20Haman%20et%20al.%20Ratings_of_age_of_acquisition_of_299_words_across_25_Languages_-_revised-after_proofs.pdf https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/16005/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
18 |
Creating an international, multidisciplinary, aphasia dataset of individual patient data (IPD) for the REhabilitation and recovery of peopLE with Aphasia after StrokE (RELEASE) project
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|