1 |
Modeling a direct role of vocabulary size in driving cross-accent word identification
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol 43, iss 43 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Word learning in the field: Adapting a laboratory-based task for testing in remote Papua New Guinea
|
|
|
|
In: PLoS One (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Cross-situational learning of phonologically overlapping words across degrees of ambiguity
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Resilience of English vowel perception across regional accent variation
|
|
|
|
In: Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology; Vol 9, No 1 (2018); 11 ; 1868-6354 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Resilience of English vowel perception across regional accent variation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Resilience of English vowel perception across regional accent variation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
"Mummy, keep it steady" : phonetic variation shapes word learning at 15 and 17 months
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Resilience of English vowel perception across regional accent variation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Indexical and linguistic processing by 12-month-olds : discrimination of speaker, accent and vowel differences
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Acoustic properties predict perception of unfamiliar Dutch vowels by adult Australian English and Peruvian Spanish listeners
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
More Limitations to Monolingualism: Bilinguals Outperform Monolinguals in Implicit Word Learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Infants Encode Phonetic Detail during Cross-Situational Word Learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Infants encode phonetic detail during cross-situational word learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
The role of positive affect in the acquisition of word-object associations
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Cross-situational learning of minimal word pairs
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Cross-situational statistical learning of words involves tracking co-occurrences of auditory words and objects across time to infer word-referent mappings. Previous research has demonstrated that learners can infer referents across sets of very phonologically distinct words (e.g., WUG, DAX), but it remains unknown whether learners can encode fine phonological differences during cross-situational statistical learning. This study examined learners’ cross-situational statistical learning of minimal pairs that differed on one consonant segment (e.g., BON–TON), minimal pairs that differed on one vowel segment (e.g., DEET–DIT), and non-minimal pairs that differed on two or three segments (e.g., BON–DEET). Learners performed above chance for all pairs, but performed worse on vowel minimal pairs than on consonant minimal pairs or non-minimal pairs. These findings demonstrate that learners can encode fine phonetic detail while tracking word-referent co-occurrence probabilities, but they suggest that phonological encoding may be weaker for vowels than for consonants.
|
|
Keyword:
cross-situational; language acquisition; pairs; phonetics; statistical learning; words; XXXXXX - Unknown
|
|
URL: http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/uws:34749 https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12243
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
17 |
More limitations to monolingualism : bilinguals outperform monolinguals in implicit word learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Message vs. messenger effects on cross-modal matching for spoken phrases
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Indexical and linguistic processing in infancy : discrimination of speaker, accent and vowel differences
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|