2 |
Problematising Characteristicness:A Biomedical Association Case Study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Infrastructure for Semantic Annotation in the Genomics Domain
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Differentiating act from ideology: evidence from messages for and against violent extremism
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
The language of Islamic extremism:towards an automated identification of beliefs, motivations and justifications
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
The language of Islamic extremism: Towards an automated identification of beliefs, motivations and justifications
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Analyzing the semantic content and persuasive composition of extremist media:a case study of texts produced during the Gaza conflict
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Using automated semantic tagging in Critical Discourse Analysis:a case study on Scottish independence from a Scottish nationalist perspective
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Empowerment and disempowerment in the Glencairn Uprising: A corpus-based critical analysis of Early Modern English news discourse.
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
The Glencairn Uprising (1653–1654) was a military rebellion by Scottish Highlanders under the leadership of William, Earl of Glencairn, against the English government of Oliver Cromwell. This paper investigates the presentation of actors and groups on both sides of the Uprising — but most especially Glencairn himself — in the contemporary London press. The theoretical framework of the analysis is Critical Discourse Analysis (modelled especially on the approach of van Dijk 1991); however, a corpus-based methodology, and a partially-quantitative analysis, are employed. The documents in question — a corpus of newsbooks published in late 1653 and the first half of 1654 — are analysed by a process of assigning concordance lines extracted using a wide set of search terms to particular categories of discourse-semantic meaning. The newsbooks are shown to make use of greatly contrasting discourses in their representations of Glencairn and others, resulting in “discourses of empowerment and disempowerment” (the latter being associated secondarily with a “discourse of disunity”). By employing these discourses, the newsbook journalists discredit Glencairn and his associates, whilst crediting the English and their associates.
|
|
URL: https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/58877/ https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.10.1.03pre
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
13 |
Empowerment and disempowerment in the Glencairn Uprising: A corpus-based critical analysis of Early Modern English news discourse
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|