| 1 |
The sign superiority effect: Lexical status facilitates peripheral handshape identification for deaf signers
|
|
|
|
In: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Music is similar to language in terms of working memory interference
|
|
|
|
In: Psychon Bull Rev (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
What reading aloud reveals about speaking: Regressive saccades implicate a failure to monitor, not inattention, in the prevalence of intrusion errors on function words ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
What reading aloud reveals about speaking: Regressive saccades implicate a failure to monitor, not inattention, in the prevalence of intrusion errors on function words ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Eye movements in reading and information processing: Keith Rayner's 40 year legacy
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Semantic and Plausibility Preview Benefit Effects in English: Evidence from Eye Movements
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
The effect of contextual constraint on parafoveal processing in reading
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Data from: Semantic preview benefit in reading English: The effect of initial letter capitalization. In Keith Rayner Eye Movements in Reading Data Collection. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Task Effects Reveal Cognitive Flexibility Responding to Frequency and Predictability: Evidence from Eye Movements in Reading and Proofreading
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
It is well-known that word frequency and predictability affect processing time. These effects change magnitude across tasks, but studies testing this use tasks with different response types (e.g., lexical decision, naming, and fixation time during reading; Schilling, Rayner & Chumbley, 1998), preventing direct comparison. Recently, Kaakinen and Hyönä (2010) overcame this problem, comparing fixation times in reading for comprehension and proofreading, showing that the frequency effect was larger in proofreading than in reading. This result could be explained by readers exhibiting substantial cognitive flexibility, and qualitatively changing how they process words in the proofreading task in a way that magnifies effects of word frequency. Alternatively, readers may not change word processing so dramatically, and instead may perform more careful identification generally, increasing the magnitude of many word processing effects (e.g., both frequency and predictability). We tested these possibilities with two experiments: subjects read for comprehension and then proofread for spelling errors (letter transpositions) that produce nonwords (e.g., trcak for track as in Kaakinen & Hyönä) or that produce real but unintended words (e.g., trial for trail) to compare how the task changes these effects. Replicating Kaakinen and Hyönä, frequency effects increased during proofreading. However, predictability effects only increased when integration with the sentence context was necessary to detect errors (i.e., when spelling errors produced words that were inappropriate in the sentence; trial for trail). The results suggest that readers adopt sophisticated word processing strategies to accommodate task demands.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.018
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3943895
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24434024
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Multiple Levels of Bilingual Language Control: Evidence from Language Intrusions in Reading Aloud
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Do verb bias effects on sentence production reflect sensitivity to comprehension or production factors?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Parallel Object Activation and Attentional Gating of Information: Evidence from Eye Movements in the Multiple Object Naming Paradigm
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
