| 1 |
Dosage, intensity, and frequency of language therapy for aphasia: a systematic review–based, individual participant data network meta-analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: the RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Dosage, Intensity, and Frequency of Language Therapy for Aphasia: A Systematic Review-Based, Individual Participant Data Network Meta-Analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: the RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Predictors of poststroke aphasia recovery: a systematic review-informed individual participant data meta-analysis
|
|
Ali, M; VandenBerg, K; Williams, LJ; Williams, LR; Abo, M; Becker, F; Bowen, A; Brandenburg, C; Breitenstein, C; Bruehl, S; Copland, DA; Cranfill, TB; Pietro-Bachmann, MD; Enderby, P; Fillingham, J; Lucia Galli, F; Gandolfi, M; Glize, B; Godecke, E; Hawkins, N; Hilari, K; Hinckley, J; Horton, S; Howard, D; Jaecks, P; Jefferies, E; Jesus, LMT; Kambanaros, M; Kyoung Kang, E; Khedr, EM; Pak-Hin Kong, A; Kukkonen, T; Laganaro, M; Lambon Ralph, MA; Charlotte Laska, A; Leemann, B; Leff, AP; Lima, RR; Lorenz, A; Mac Whinney, B; Shisler Marshall, R; Mattioli, F; Maviş, İ; Meinzer, M; Nilipour, R; Noé, E; Paik, N-J; Palmer, R; Papathanasiou, I; Patricio, BF; Pavão Martins, I; Price, C; Prizl Jakovac, T; Rochon, E; Rose, ML; Rosso, C; Rubi-Fessen, I; Ruiter, MB; Snell, C; Stahl, B; Szaflarski, JP; Thomas, SA; van de Sandt-Koenderman, M; van der Meulen, I; Visch-Brink, E; Worrall, L; Harris Wright, H; Brady, MC. - : Wolters Kluwer Health, 2021
|
|
Abstract:
Background and Purpose: The factors associated with recovery of language domains after stroke remain uncertain. We described recovery of overall-language-ability, auditory comprehension, naming, and functional-communication across participants’ age, sex, and aphasia chronicity in a large, multilingual, international aphasia dataset. Methods: Individual participant data meta-analysis of systematically sourced aphasia datasets described overall-language ability using the Western Aphasia Battery Aphasia-Quotient; auditory comprehension by Aachen Aphasia Test (AAT) Token Test; naming by Boston Naming Test and functional-communication by AAT Spontaneous-Speech Communication subscale. Multivariable analyses regressed absolute score-changes from baseline across language domains onto covariates identified a priori in randomized controlled trials and all study types. Change-from-baseline scores were presented as estimates of means and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was described using relative variance. Risk of bias was considered at dataset and meta-analysis level. Results: Assessments at baseline (median=43.6 weeks poststroke; interquartile range [4–165.1]) and first-follow-up (median=10 weeks from baseline; interquartile range [3–26]) were available for n=943 on overall-language ability, n=1056 on auditory comprehension, n=791 on naming and n=974 on functional-communication. Younger age (<55 years, +15.4 Western Aphasia Battery Aphasia-Quotient points [CI, 10.0–20.9], +6.1 correct on AAT Token Test [CI, 3.2–8.9]; +9.3 Boston Naming Test points [CI, 4.7–13.9]; +0.8 AAT Spontaneous-Speech Communication subscale points [CI, 0.5–1.0]) and enrollment <1 month post-onset (+19.1 Western Aphasia Battery Aphasia-Quotient points [CI, 13.9–24.4]; +5.3 correct on AAT Token Test [CI, 1.7–8.8]; +11.1 Boston Naming Test points [CI, 5.7–16.5]; and +1.1 AAT Spontaneous-Speech Communication subscale point [CI, 0.7–1.4]) conferred the greatest absolute change-from-baseline across each language domain. Improvements in language scores from baseline diminished with increasing age and aphasia chronicity. Data exhibited no significant statistical heterogeneity. Risk-of-bias was low to moderate-low. Conclusions: Earlier intervention for poststroke aphasia as crucial to maximize language recovery across a range of language domains, although recovery continued to be observed to a lesser extent beyond 6 months poststroke.
|
|
URL: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/172869/1/STROKEAHA.120.031162.pdf
https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/172869/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Communicating simply, but not too simply: Reporting of participants and speech and language interventions for aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
RELEASE: A protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
RELEASE : a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
RELEASE: a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
In: Aphasiology, 2019 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Tidier descriptions of speech and language therapy interventions for people with aphasia; consensus from the release collaboration
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Tidier descriptions of speech and language therapy interventions for people with aphasia; consensus from the RELEASE collaboration
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
