1 |
Developing, monitoring, and reporting of fidelity in aphasia trials: Core recommendations from the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists (CATs) Trials for Aphasia Panel
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Dosage, intensity, and frequency of language therapy for aphasia: a systematic review–based, individual participant data network meta-analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: the RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Dosage, Intensity, and Frequency of Language Therapy for Aphasia: A Systematic Review-Based, Individual Participant Data Network Meta-Analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: the RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Predictors of poststroke aphasia recovery: a systematic review-informed individual participant data meta-analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Establishing consensus on a definition of aphasia: an e-Delphi study of international aphasia researchers
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Communicating simply, but not too simply: Reporting of participants and speech and language interventions for aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
RELEASE: A protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Increasing the intensity and comprehensiveness of aphasia services: identification of key factors influencing implementation across six countries
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
RELEASE : a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement
|
|
Wallace, S.J.; Worrall, L.; Rose, T.; Le Dorze, G.; Breitenstein, C.; Hilari, K.; Babbitt, E.; Bose, A.; Brady, M.; Cherney, L.R.; Copland, D.; Cruice, M.; Enderby, P.; Hersh, D.; Howe, T.; Kelly, H.; Kiran, S.; Laska, A.-C.; Marshall, J.; Nicholas, M.; Patterson, J.; Pearl, G.; Rochon, E.; Rose, M.; Sage, K.; Small, S.; Webster, J.. - : SAGE Publications, 2019
|
|
Abstract:
Background A core outcome set (COS; an agreed, minimum set of outcomes) was needed to address the heterogeneous measurement of outcomes in aphasia treatment research and to facilitate the production of transparent, meaningful, and efficient outcome data. Objective The Research Outcome Measurement in Aphasia (ROMA) consensus statement provides evidence-based recommendations for the measurement of outcomes for adults with post-stroke aphasia within phases I–IV aphasia treatment studies. Methods This statement was informed by a four-year program of research, which comprised investigation of stakeholder-important outcomes using consensus processes, a scoping review of aphasia outcome measurement instruments, and an international consensus meeting. This paper provides an overview of this process and presents the results and recommendations arising from the international consensus meeting. Results Five essential outcome constructs were identified: Language, communication, patient-reported satisfaction with treatment and impact of treatment, emotional wellbeing, and quality of life. Consensus was reached for the following measurement instruments: Language: The Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WAB-R) (74% consensus); emotional wellbeing: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)-12 (83% consensus); quality of life: Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) (96% consensus). Consensus was unable to be reached for measures of communication (where multiple measures exist) or patient-reported satisfaction with treatment or impact of treatment (where no measures exist). Discussion Harmonization of the ROMA COS with other core outcome initiatives in stroke rehabilitation is discussed. Ongoing research and consensus processes are outlined. Conclusion The WAB-R, GHQ-12, and SAQOL-39 are recommended to be routinely included within phases I–IV aphasia treatment studies. This consensus statement has been endorsed by the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists, the British Aphasiology Society, the German Society for Aphasia Research and Therapy, and the Royal College of Speech Language Therapists.
|
|
URL: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/140819/ https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/140819/8/Sage-CoreOutcomeSetForAphasiaTreatment%28AM%29.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
14 |
RELEASE: a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
In: Aphasiology, 2019 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Tidier descriptions of speech and language therapy interventions for people with aphasia; consensus from the release collaboration
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: the ROMA consensus statement
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Tidier descriptions of speech and language therapy interventions for people with aphasia; consensus from the RELEASE collaboration
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
ASK (Action Success Knowledge), a psychosocial intervention to prevent depression in people with post stroke aphasia - treatment fidelity
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? an international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Preliminary Psychometric Analyses of Two Assessment Measures Quantifying Communicative and Social Activities: the COMACT and SOCACT
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|