| 1 |
Extraction of transforming sequences and sentence histories from writing process data : a first step towards linguistic modeling of writing ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
The Writing Process of Bilingual Students with Focus on Revisions and Spelling Errors in Their Final Texts
|
|
|
|
In: Languages; Volume 7; Issue 1; Pages: 61 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
An Overview of Writing Process Research: Using Innovative Tasks and Techniques for a Better Understanding of L2 Writing Processes in Assessment Contexts
|
|
|
|
In: Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, Vol 21, Iss 2 (2022) (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
An Overview of Writing Process Research: Using Innovative Tasks and Techniques for a Better Understanding of L2 Writing Processes in Assessment Contexts
|
|
|
|
In: Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, Vol 21, Iss 2 (2022) (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
A Process-oriented Dataset of Revisions during Writing
|
|
|
|
In: English Conference Papers, Posters and Proceedings (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
The effect of automated fluency feedback on written text production
|
|
|
|
In: Graduate Theses and Dissertations (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Profiling effects of syntactic complexity in translation : a multi-method approach ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
L2 writers' revisions in a computer-based academic English writing test task: a keystroke logging study
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
A thesis submitted to the University of Bedfordshire, in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ; This study investigated the revision patterns and purposes of forty native Urdu speaking English L2 writers in a computer-based academic English writing test task. The chosen writers were divided into a more successful and less successful group based on the score obtained in the given IELTS academic writing task 2. A keystroke logging program Inputlog recorded each writing session including all revisions, and it could be re-played after the session. From the recorded sessions, idea or meaning related revisions were further investigated. The writers were shown these revisions immediately after the session as a stimulus, and verbal protocols were obtained to investigate their revision purposes. The revisions obtained from keystroke logging program were analysed using a revision taxonomy based on Stevenson, Schoonen and Glopper (2006) and Lindgren and Sullivan (2006) studies. Findings suggested that in general, both groups focused on form revisions more than the concept revisions. But, more successful writers made conceptual revisions more than form revisions. Also, more successful writers revised larger text chunks, such as clause, sentence and paragraph. Both the groups reported seven revision purposes; however, eighth category 'writers did not remember' also emerged from the data. The seven revision purposes included clarity, explicitness or emphasis, coherence, hedging, modify an idea, eliminate an idea, creating a new global content unit and making text reader-friendly. However, more successful writers expressed more awareness of their revision purposes than less successful writers. The findings of this study have theoretical, pedagogical and methodological implications, particularly in the Urdu L1 context. These findings provide empirical evidence about the revision patterns and purposes of L2 writers which may be useful for the teachers or instructors teaching English writing to L2 writers, particularly to the Urdu speaking English L2 writers. They can use these findings to help them improve their writing skills by focusing on the revisions. However, future research in this area is suggested.
|
|
Keyword:
keystroke logging; L2 writers; more successful and less successful writers; revision patterns; revision purposes; Subject Categories::Q110 Applied Linguistics; Urdu L1
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10547/624939
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 9 |
The affordances of process-tracing technologies for supporting L2 writing instruction
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Réflexions sur les opérations de modification de l'écriture enregistrée
|
|
|
|
In: RJC2018 - 21èmes Rencontres des jeunes chercheurs en Sciences du Langage ; https://hal-univ-paris3.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02399419 ; RJC2018 - 21èmes Rencontres des jeunes chercheurs en Sciences du Langage, May 2018, Paris, France (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
The affordances of process-tracing technologies for supporting L2 writing instruction
|
|
|
|
In: English Publications (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Eesti keele kui teise keele kirjutamisprotsessi sujuvuse võrdlus keeleoskustasemeti
|
|
|
|
In: Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat, Vol 13, Pp 107-122 (2017) (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
On the applicability of Internet-mediated research methods to investigate translators’ cognitive behaviour
|
|
|
|
In: Translation and Interpreting : the International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research, Vol 7, Iss 1 (2015) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Pauses in spontaneous written communication: A keystroke logging study
|
|
|
|
In: English Publications (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Picture-elicited written narratives, process and product, in 18 children with cochlear implants
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
