DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3
Hits 1 – 20 of 51

1
LA PRODUCTION ECRITE EN FRANÇAIS L2 : focus sur le processus de formulation
Gunnarsson-Largy, Cecilia. - : HAL CCSD, 2022
In: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03640707 ; Linguistique. Université Toulouse – Jean Jaurès, 2022 (2022)
BASE
Show details
2
An Overview of Writing Process Research: Using Innovative Tasks and Techniques for a Better Understanding of L2 Writing Processes in Assessment Contexts
In: Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, Vol 21, Iss 2 (2022) (2022)
BASE
Show details
3
An Overview of Writing Process Research: Using Innovative Tasks and Techniques for a Better Understanding of L2 Writing Processes in Assessment Contexts
In: Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, Vol 21, Iss 2 (2022) (2022)
BASE
Show details
4
Completing the first assignment: A case study of the writing processes of a successful and an unsuccessful student
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2021)
BASE
Show details
5
BORN OR MADE: PROBLEMS OF PROSE STYLE & STYLISTIC IMPROVABILITY AT THE SENTENCE LEVEL, AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH
BASE
Show details
6
Collaborative Placement of Multilingual Writers: Combining Formal Assessment and Self-Evaluation
In: Journal of Writing Assessment, vol 13, iss 1 (2020)
BASE
Show details
7
Methodische Zugänge zur Untersuchung akademischer Textproduktion
Baumgärtner, Alena. - : Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2020
BASE
Show details
8
The impact of mediation on technology-supported individual and collaborative writing
Stell, Annita. - : The University of Queensland, School of Languages and Cultures, 2020
BASE
Show details
9
Les écritures médiatiques partagées de la mémoire – patrimonialisation et paradigme de l’immatériel
In: Communication & langages, N 203, 1, 2020-02-27, pp.175-195 (2020)
BASE
Show details
10
Competencia Comunicativa Intercultural Crítica y escritura académica: Análisis de los (sub)procesos de creación textual en estudiantes universitarios de Español Lengua Extranjera (E/LE)
In: Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras, ISSN 1697-7467, Nº. 34, 2020, pags. 169-192 (2020)
BASE
Show details
11
Differences Between Expository and Narrative Items in a College-Level Reading Comprehension Assessment
In: Georgia Educational Research Association Conference (2019)
BASE
Show details
12
The affordances of process-tracing technologies for supporting L2 writing instruction
Ranalli, Jim; Feng, Hui-Hsien; Chukharev-Hudilainen, Evgeny. - : University of Hawaii National Foreign Language Resource Center, 2019. : University of Texas at Austin Center for Open Educational Resources and Language Learning, 2019
BASE
Show details
13
The affordances of process-tracing technologies for supporting L2 writing instruction
In: English Publications (2018)
BASE
Show details
14
Learning from Failure: Making the Feedback Loop Work
In: Georgia International Conference on Information Literacy (2018)
Abstract: “I spend hours providing feedback, but I have no idea if my students read it” is a common phrase echoed across college campuses. While best practices in teaching pedagogy laud the feedback cycle, many instructors question the impact their feedback has on their students’ writing. As the feedback loop continues to be a trending cog in the machine of formative assessment and authentic education, an essential component of the loop is often overlooked: the conversation. Presenters will focus on providing easy-to-implement “conversation” opportunities for students to respond to instructor feedback. This reflective practice provides insight into a student’s learning processes, understanding of the feedback provided, and an open door to growth possibilities. Utilizing a variety of tools, we will explore how feedback conversations can be incorporated into the face-to-face, blended, and online classrooms. Presenters will discuss implementing feedback practices in composition and information literacy courses, providing strategies for faculty/librarian collaboration, on-the-fly implementation, and how to use feedback data to effect sustained change. The benefit in closing the feedback loop with the conversation piece supports students and instructors in the teaching and learning process. Students feel like they have a voice in their learning by having an outlet to share enduring concerns and appreciation for clarification and the opportunity to improve. Instructors are able to identify “stuck places” where students struggle with content and concepts and build supporting curriculum around those places. For both parties, the process serves as a point of motivation and forward momentum.
Keyword: assessment; collaboration; Curriculum and Instruction; Education; feedback loop; Information Literacy; instruction strategies; learning processes; Library and Information Science; reflective practice; Rhetoric and Composition; scholarly conversation; Scholarship of Teaching and Learning; teaching and learning; writing prompts
URL: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/gaintlit/2018/2018/18
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2008&context=gaintlit
BASE
Hide details
15
Challenging the hidden curriculum through problem based learning : a reflection on curricular design
Hough, Lorena; Hegazi, Iman (R18570). - : U.K., AMEE MedEdPublish, 2018
BASE
Show details
16
The Pleasures of Writing about the Pleasures of the Practice: Documenting Psychophysical Performer Trainings
Clarke, Alissa. - : Bloomsbury Methuen Drama, 2017
BASE
Show details
17
Learning from Failure: Making the Feedback Loop Work
In: Georgia International Conference on Information Literacy (2017)
BASE
Show details
18
Military Legislation: Explaining Military Officers' Writing Deficiencies
Borysov,Andrii. - 2016
BASE
Show details
19
Graphic traces and writing processes at school ; Traces graphiques à l’école : quels indices de processus rédactionnels ?
In: Colloque des Jeunes Chercheurs en Sciences du Langage : Trace (s) ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03175705 ; Colloque des Jeunes Chercheurs en Sciences du Langage : Trace (s), Laboratoire Praxiling (UMR5267). Université Paul-Valéry, Montpellier III., Oct 2015, MONTPELLIER, France (2015)
BASE
Show details
20
Visualization of computer-supported argumentative writing processes using C-SAW
In: ISSN: 1843-4460 ; Revista Română de Interacțiune Om-Calculator, Vol. 8, No 4 (2015) pp. 281-302 (2015)
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
51
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern