1 |
LA PRODUCTION ECRITE EN FRANÇAIS L2 : focus sur le processus de formulation
|
|
|
|
In: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03640707 ; Linguistique. Université Toulouse – Jean Jaurès, 2022 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
An Overview of Writing Process Research: Using Innovative Tasks and Techniques for a Better Understanding of L2 Writing Processes in Assessment Contexts
|
|
|
|
In: Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, Vol 21, Iss 2 (2022) (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
An Overview of Writing Process Research: Using Innovative Tasks and Techniques for a Better Understanding of L2 Writing Processes in Assessment Contexts
|
|
|
|
In: Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, Vol 21, Iss 2 (2022) (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Completing the first assignment: A case study of the writing processes of a successful and an unsuccessful student
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
BORN OR MADE: PROBLEMS OF PROSE STYLE & STYLISTIC IMPROVABILITY AT THE SENTENCE LEVEL, AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Collaborative Placement of Multilingual Writers: Combining Formal Assessment and Self-Evaluation
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Writing Assessment, vol 13, iss 1 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Methodische Zugänge zur Untersuchung akademischer Textproduktion
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
The impact of mediation on technology-supported individual and collaborative writing
|
|
Stell, Annita. - : The University of Queensland, School of Languages and Cultures, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Les écritures médiatiques partagées de la mémoire – patrimonialisation et paradigme de l’immatériel
|
|
|
|
In: Communication & langages, N 203, 1, 2020-02-27, pp.175-195 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Competencia Comunicativa Intercultural Crítica y escritura académica: Análisis de los (sub)procesos de creación textual en estudiantes universitarios de Español Lengua Extranjera (E/LE)
|
|
|
|
In: Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras, ISSN 1697-7467, Nº. 34, 2020, pags. 169-192 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Differences Between Expository and Narrative Items in a College-Level Reading Comprehension Assessment
|
|
|
|
In: Georgia Educational Research Association Conference (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
The affordances of process-tracing technologies for supporting L2 writing instruction
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
The affordances of process-tracing technologies for supporting L2 writing instruction
|
|
|
|
In: English Publications (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Learning from Failure: Making the Feedback Loop Work
|
|
|
|
In: Georgia International Conference on Information Literacy (2018)
|
|
Abstract:
“I spend hours providing feedback, but I have no idea if my students read it” is a common phrase echoed across college campuses. While best practices in teaching pedagogy laud the feedback cycle, many instructors question the impact their feedback has on their students’ writing. As the feedback loop continues to be a trending cog in the machine of formative assessment and authentic education, an essential component of the loop is often overlooked: the conversation. Presenters will focus on providing easy-to-implement “conversation” opportunities for students to respond to instructor feedback. This reflective practice provides insight into a student’s learning processes, understanding of the feedback provided, and an open door to growth possibilities. Utilizing a variety of tools, we will explore how feedback conversations can be incorporated into the face-to-face, blended, and online classrooms. Presenters will discuss implementing feedback practices in composition and information literacy courses, providing strategies for faculty/librarian collaboration, on-the-fly implementation, and how to use feedback data to effect sustained change. The benefit in closing the feedback loop with the conversation piece supports students and instructors in the teaching and learning process. Students feel like they have a voice in their learning by having an outlet to share enduring concerns and appreciation for clarification and the opportunity to improve. Instructors are able to identify “stuck places” where students struggle with content and concepts and build supporting curriculum around those places. For both parties, the process serves as a point of motivation and forward momentum.
|
|
Keyword:
assessment; collaboration; Curriculum and Instruction; Education; feedback loop; Information Literacy; instruction strategies; learning processes; Library and Information Science; reflective practice; Rhetoric and Composition; scholarly conversation; Scholarship of Teaching and Learning; teaching and learning; writing prompts
|
|
URL: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/gaintlit/2018/2018/18 https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2008&context=gaintlit
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
15 |
Challenging the hidden curriculum through problem based learning : a reflection on curricular design
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
The Pleasures of Writing about the Pleasures of the Practice: Documenting Psychophysical Performer Trainings
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Learning from Failure: Making the Feedback Loop Work
|
|
|
|
In: Georgia International Conference on Information Literacy (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Military Legislation: Explaining Military Officers' Writing Deficiencies
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Graphic traces and writing processes at school ; Traces graphiques à l’école : quels indices de processus rédactionnels ?
|
|
|
|
In: Colloque des Jeunes Chercheurs en Sciences du Langage : Trace (s) ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03175705 ; Colloque des Jeunes Chercheurs en Sciences du Langage : Trace (s), Laboratoire Praxiling (UMR5267). Université Paul-Valéry, Montpellier III., Oct 2015, MONTPELLIER, France (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Visualization of computer-supported argumentative writing processes using C-SAW
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 1843-4460 ; Revista Română de Interacțiune Om-Calculator, Vol. 8, No 4 (2015) pp. 281-302 (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|