DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4 5
Hits 1 – 20 of 90

1
Spatial Language Use Predicts Spatial Memory of Children: Evidence from Sign, Speech, and Speech-plus-gesture ...
BASE
Show details
2
Application of machine learning to signal entrainment identifies predictive processing in sign language. ...
BASE
Show details
3
Application of machine learning to signal entrainment identifies predictive processing in sign language. ...
BASE
Show details
4
Language Proficiency Impacts the Benefits of Co-Speech Gesture for Narrative Understanding Through a Visual Attention Mechanism ...
BASE
Show details
5
A common framework for quantifying the learnability of nouns and verbs ...
BASE
Show details
6
The Role of Hand Gestures in Emotion Communication ...
BASE
Show details
7
Towards a Cognitive Model of Collaborative Memory ...
BASE
Show details
8
The Role of Hand Gestures in Emotion Communication ...
BASE
Show details
9
Testing an interference-based model of working memory in children with developmental language disorder and their typically developing peers ...
BASE
Show details
10
Variation in spatial concepts: Different frames of reference on different axes ...
Abstract: The physical properties of space may be universal, but the way people conceptualize space is not. In some groups, people tend to use egocentric space (e.g. left, right) to encode the locations of objects, while in other groups, people encode the same spatial scene using allocentric space (e.g. upriver, downriver). These different spatial Frames of Reference (FoRs) characterize the way people talk about spatial relations and the way they think about them, even when they are not using language. Although spatial language and spatial thinking tend to covary, the root causes of this variation are unclear. Here we propose that this variation in FoR use reflects the spatial discriminability of the relevant spatial continua. In an initial test of this proposal in a group of indigenous Bolivians, we compared FoR use across spatial axes that are known to differ in discriminability. In two non-verbal tests, participants spontaneously used different FoRs on different spatial axes: On the lateral axis, where egocentric ...
Keyword: Applied Linguistics; Cognitive Linguistics; Cognitive Science; Pragmaliguistics; Psycholinguistics; Semiotics
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.48448/sygf-cp28
https://underline.io/lecture/27420-variation-in-spatial-concepts-different-frames-of-reference-on-different-axes
BASE
Hide details
11
Verbal working memory capacity modulates category representation. ...
BASE
Show details
12
Testing an interference-based model of working memory in children with developmental language disorder and their typically developing peers ...
BASE
Show details
13
A metric of children’s inference-making difficulty during language comprehension ...
BASE
Show details
14
Verbal working memory capacity modulates category representation. ...
BASE
Show details
15
Keep Calm and Move On: Interplay between Morphological Cue Occurrence and Frequency-based Heuristics for Sentence Comprehension in Korean ...
BASE
Show details
16
Keep Calm and Move On: Interplay between Morphological Cue Occurrence and Frequency-based Heuristics for Sentence Comprehension in Korean ...
BASE
Show details
17
Word Probability Re-Estimation Using Topic Modeling and Lexical Decision Data ...
BASE
Show details
18
Memory Constraints on Cross Situational Word Learning ...
BASE
Show details
19
Memory Constraints on Cross Situational Word Learning ...
BASE
Show details
20
Do gestures really facilitate speech production? ...
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
90
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern