4 |
The role of native and non-native grammars in the comprehension of possessive pronouns ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Straight from the horse's mouth: agreement attraction effects with Turkish possessors ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Do processing resource limitations shape heritage language grammars?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Cleft Focus and Antecedent Accessibility: The Emergence of the Anti-focus Effect
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Island effects in Spanish comprehension
|
|
|
|
In: WOS:000518674900001 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Inappropriate Choice of Definites in Turkish Heritage Speakers of German
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 1550-7076 ; Heritage Language Journal ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02126829 ; Heritage Language Journal, Center for World Languages of UCLA, UC Consortium for Language Learning and Teaching, 2019, 16(1) (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
The processing of Negative Polarity Items in Turkish-German bilingual speakers
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of GALA 2017: Language Acquisition and Development ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02054644 ; Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes; Cristina Suárez-Gómez. Proceedings of GALA 2017: Language Acquisition and Development, pp.117 - 133, 2019, 978-1-5275-2190-2 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Structure-sensitive constraints in non-native sentence processing
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of the European Second Language Association; Vol 3, No 1 (2019); 12–22 ; 2399-9101 (2019)
|
|
Abstract:
Studies examining the real-time application of structure-sensitive constraints in second-language (L2) sentence processing have shown that depending on the type of constraint under investigation, the constraint may be more likely, equally (un)likely, or less likely to be violated during L2 than during native (first-language, L1) processing. Several attempts have been made in the past to attribute L1/L2 processing differences to a specific underlying cause, including cognitive resource limitations, reduced sensitivity to grammatical information, or increased susceptibility to memory interference during L2 processing. Focusing on recent findings on the processing of referential and filler-gap dependencies, I argue that trying to reduce L1/L2 processing differences to a single cause is misguided. What is called for instead is a more careful investigation of how different types of constraint and information sources interact during L2 comprehension, taking into account what linguistic cues need to be extracted from the input or need to be re-accessed in order for a given constraint to be applied. This should provide us with a more nuanced picture of how the relative weighting or timing of constraints or information sources might differ in L2 in comparison to L1 processing.
|
|
Keyword:
binding; eye-movement monitoring; filler-gap dependencies; L2 processing; pronoun resolution; sentence comprehension
|
|
URL: https://www.euroslajournal.org/jms/article/view/52 https://doi.org/10.22599/jesla.52
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
18 |
Delayed Application of Binding Condition C During Cataphoric Pronoun Resolution
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Delayed Application of Binding Condition C During Cataphoric Pronoun Resolution
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|