| 1 |
Unconstrained multivariate EEG decoding can help detect lexical-semantic processing in individual children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Neural assessment of language in children (Petit et al., 2020) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Neural assessment of language in children (Petit et al., 2020) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Unconstrained multivariate EEG decoding can help detect lexical-semantic processing in individual children. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Unconstrained multivariate EEG decoding can help detect lexical-semantic processing in individual children ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Toward an Individualized Neural Assessment of Receptive Language in Children. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Unconstrained multivariate EEG decoding can help detect lexical-semantic processing in individual children ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Unconstrained multivariate EEG decoding can help detect lexical-semantic processing in individual children
|
|
|
|
In: Sci Rep (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Toward an Individualized Neural Assessment of Receptive Language in Children.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Unconstrained multivariate EEG decoding can help detect lexical-semantic processing in individual children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Unconstrained multivariate EEG decoding can help detect lexical-semantic processing in individual children.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Towards an individualised neural assessment of receptive language in children
|
|
Petit, Selene; Badcock, Nicholas A.; Grootswagers, Tijl; Rich, Anina N.; Brock, Jon; Nickels, Lyndsey; Moerel, Denise; Dermody, Nadene; Yau, Shu; Schmidt, Elaine; Woolgar, Alexandra
|
|
In: J Speech Lang Hear Res (2020)
|
|
Abstract:
PURPOSE: We aimed to develop a non-invasive neural test of language comprehension to use with non-speaking children for whom standard behavioural testing is unreliable (e.g., minimally-verbal autism). Our aims were three-fold. First, we sought to establish the sensitivity of two auditory paradigms to elicit neural responses in individual neurotypical children. Second, we aimed to validate the use of a portable and accessible electroencephalography (EEG) system, by comparing its recordings to those of a research-grade system. Third, in light of substantial inter-individual variability in individuals’ neural responses, we assessed whether multivariate decoding methods could improve sensitivity. METHODS: We tested the sensitivity of two child-friendly covert N400 paradigms. Thirty-one typically developing children listened to identical spoken words that were either strongly predicted by the preceding context or violated lexical-semantic expectations. Context was given by a cue word (Experiment 1) or sentence frame (Experiment 2) and participants either made an overall judgement on word relatedness or counted lexical-semantic violations. We measured EEG concurrently from a research-grade system, Neuroscan’s SynAmps2, and an adapted gaming system, Emotiv’s EPOC+. RESULTS: We found substantial inter-individual variability in the timing and topology of N400-like effects. For both paradigms and EEG systems, traditional N400 effects at the expected sensors and time points were statistically significant in around 50% of individuals. Using multivariate analyses, detection rate increased to 88% of individuals for the research-grade system in the sentences paradigm, illustrating the robustness of this method in the face of inter-individual variations in topography. CONCLUSIONS: There was large inter-individual variability in neural responses, suggesting inter-individual variation in either the cognitive response to lexical-semantic violations, and/or the neural substrate of that response. Around half of our neurotypical participants showed the expected N400 effect at the expected location and time point. A low-cost, accessible EEG system provided comparable data for univariate analysis but was not well suited to multivariate decoding. However, multivariate analyses with a research-grade EEG system increased our detection rate to 88% of individuals. This approach provides a strong foundation to establish a neural index of language comprehension in children with limited communication.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32640176
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7116229/
https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00313
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Unconstrained multivariate EEG decoding can help detect lexical-semantic processing in individual children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Toward an individualized neural assessment of receptive language in children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Supplementary_Materials_QJEP – Supplemental material for Paired associate learning deficits in poor readers: The contribution of phonological input and output processes ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Paired associate learning deficits in poor readers: The contribution of phonological input and output processes ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
APPENDIX_QJEP – Supplemental material for Paired associate learning deficits in poor readers: The contribution of phonological input and output processes ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Supplementary_Materials_QJEP – Supplemental material for Paired associate learning deficits in poor readers: The contribution of phonological input and output processes ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Paired associate learning deficits in poor readers: The contribution of phonological input and output processes ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
APPENDIX_QJEP – Supplemental material for Paired associate learning deficits in poor readers: The contribution of phonological input and output processes ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
