DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Hits 21 – 40 of 107

21
The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology
Schütze, Carson T.. - : Language Science Press, 2016
In: Language Science Press; (2016)
BASE
Show details
22
The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology
Schütze, Carson T.. - : Language Science Press, 2016
In: Language Science Press; (2016)
BASE
Show details
23
The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology
Schütze, Carson T.. - : Language Science Press, 2016
In: Language Science Press; (2016)
BASE
Show details
24
The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology
Schütze, Carson T.. - : Language Science Press, 2016
In: Language Science Press; (2016)
BASE
Show details
25
The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology
Schütze, Carson T.. - : Language Science Press, 2016
In: Language Science Press; (2016)
BASE
Show details
26
The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology
BASE
Show details
27
A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from "Linguistic Inquiry" 2001 - 2010
In: Lingua <Amsterdam>. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 134 (2013), 219-248
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
28
Judgment data
In: Research methods in linguistics (Cambridge, 2013), p. 27-50
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
29
A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001-2010
In: LINGUA, vol 134 (2013)
Abstract: The goal of the present study is to provide a direct comparison of the results of informal judgment collection methods with the results of formal judgment collection methods, as a first step in understanding the relative merits of each family of methods. Although previous studies have compared small samples of informal and formal results, this article presents the first large-scale comparison based on a random sample of phenomena from a leading theoretical journal (Linguistic Inquiry). We tested 296 data points from the approximately 1743 English data points that were published in Linguistic Inquiry between 2001 and 2010. We tested this sample with 936 naïve participants using three formal judgment tasks (magnitude estimation, 7-point Likert scale, and two-alternative forced-choice) and report five statistical analyses. The results suggest a convergence rate of 95% between informal and formal methods, with a margin of error of 5.3-5.8%. We discuss the implications of this convergence rate for the ongoing conversation about judgment collection methods, and lay out a set of questions for future research into syntactic methodology. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.
Keyword: Acceptability judgments; Anthropology; Clinical Research; Cognitive Sciences; Experimental syntax; Grammaticality judgments; Languages & Linguistics; Linguistics; Mental Health; Methodology
URL: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/88x529wr
BASE
Hide details
30
What the tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) says about homophone frequency inheritance
In: Memory & cognition. - Heidelberg [u.a.] : Springer 40 (2012) 5, 802-811
OLC Linguistik
Show details
31
The status of nonagreeing "don't" and theories of root infinitives
In: Language acquisition. - Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum [[2000]] 17 (2010) 4, 235-271
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
32
Web searches should supplement judgements, not supplant them
In: Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft. - Berlin : de Gruyter 28 (2009) 1, 151-156
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
33
Thinking about what we are asking speakers to do
In: Linguistic evidence. - Berlin [u.a.] : Mouton de Gruyter (2008), 457-484
BLLDB
Show details
34
The state of the art in speech error research : proceedings of the LSA institute workshop , held on 30 and 31 July 2005
Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
Show details
35
D. Gary Miller: Nonfinite structures in theory and change [Rezension]
In: Language. - Washington, DC : Linguistic Society of America 83 (2007) 2, 443-445
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
36
Introduction
In: The state of the art in speech error research (Cambridge, MA, 2007), p.1-8
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
37
What should we do with our speech error corpora? : notes from the panel discussion
In: The state of the art in speech error research (Cambridge, MA, 2007), p. 383-394
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
38
The state of the art in speech error research : proceedings of the LSA Institute workshop ; [held on 30 and 31 July 2005 as part of the Linguistic Society of America's Summer Institute in Cambridge, Massachusetts]
Schütze, Carson T. (Hrsg.). - Cambridge, Mass. : Dep. of Linguistics, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, 2007
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
39
The state of the art in speech error research : proceedings of the LSA Institute Workshop
Schütze, Carson T.; Ferreira, Victor S.. - Cambridge, MA : MIT, 2007
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
40
Case Particle Errors in Japanese: Is the Nominative ga a Default Case Marker in Sentence Production?
Iwasaki, Noriko. - : MIT, 2007
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Catalogues
6
3
16
0
1
0
6
Bibliographies
34
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
14
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
32
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern