1 |
Greek and English passives, and the role of by-phrases
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 5, No 1 (2020); 90 ; 2397-1835 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Vocatives as parenthetical adjuncts: Evidence from Arabic
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 5, No 1 (2020); 132 ; 2397-1835 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Icelandic V3 orders with temporal adjunct
|
|
|
|
In: Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers on Language & Linguistics, Vol 44, Iss 1 (2020) (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Restricciones tipológicas en la incorporación verbal de adjuntos
|
|
|
|
In: Onomázein: Revista de lingüística, filología y traducción de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, ISSN 0718-5758, Nº. 48, 2020, pags. 69-106 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
The syntax of the addressee in imperatives: What Levantine Arabic attitude datives bring to the table
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 5, No 1 (2020): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 1–15 ; 2473-8689 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
The syntactic parsing of ASD-STE100 adverbials in ARTEMIS
|
|
|
|
In: Revista de Linguistica y Lenguas Aplicadas [ISSN 1886-2438], v. 14, p. 59-79 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
The syntactic parsing of ASD-STE100 adverbials in ARTEMIS
|
|
|
|
In: Revista de Linguistica y Lenguas Aplicadas [ISSN 1886-2438], v. 14, p. 59-79 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Dative applicative elements in Arusa (Maa): Acanonical approach to the argument-adjunct distinction
|
|
|
|
In: Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, Vol 58, Iss 0, Pp 177-204 (2019) (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
The syntactic parsing of ASD-STE100 adverbials in ARTEMIS
|
|
|
|
In: Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 59-79 (2019) (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
An analysis of the semantic variability of weak adjuncts and its problems [Online resource]
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22, Vol. 2 / eds. Uli Sauerland and Stephanie Solt. Berlin, Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft: ZAS papers in linguistics ; Nr. 61 (2018), 499-516
|
|
Linguistik-Repository
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Subclasses of Temporal and Spatial Phrases in Portuguese – Location vs. Mere Reference
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Adjunct Control: Syntax and processing
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This dissertation analyzes the syntax and processing of adjunct control. Adjunct control is the referential relation between the implicit (PRO) subject of a non-finite adjunct clause and its understood antecedent, as in the temporal adjunct in ‘Holly1 went to bed [after PRO1 drinking milk]’, or the rationale clause in ‘August1 sat on the couch [in order PRO1 to read library books]’. Adjunct control is often assumed to involve a syntactic ‘Obligatory Control’ (OC) dependency, but I show that some adjuncts also permit what is referred to as ‘Non-Obligatory Control’ (NOC), as in the sentences ‘The food tasted better [after PRO drinking milk]’ and ‘The book was checked out from the library [in order PRO to read it]’, where PRO refers to some unnamed entity. I argue that for some adjuncts, OC and NOC are not in complementary distribution, contrary to assumptions of much prior literature, but in agreement with Landau (2017). Contrary to implicit assumptions of Landau, however, I also show that this OC/NOC duality does not extend to all adjuncts. I outline assumptions that Landau’s theory would have to make in order to accommodate the wider distribution of OC and NOC in adjuncts, but argue that this is better accomplished within the Movement Theory of Control (Hornstein, 1999) by relaxing the assumption that all adjuncts are phases. Even in adjuncts where both OC and NOC are possible, OC is often strongly preferred. I argue that this is in large part due to interpretive biases in processing. As a foundational step in examining what these processing biases are, the second part of this dissertation uses visual-world eyetracking to compare the timecourse of interpretation of subject-controlled PRO and overt pronouns in temporal adjuncts. The results suggest that PRO can be interpreted just as quickly as overt pronouns once the relevant bottom-up input is received. These experiments also provide evidence that structural predictions can facilitate reference resolution independent of next-mention predictions.
|
|
Keyword:
adjuncts; control; Linguistics; psycholinguistics; syntax
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.13016/M2HX15V08 http://hdl.handle.net/1903/21296
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
15 |
Posições argumentais e propriedades semânticas ; Argument positions and semantic properties
|
|
|
|
In: DELTA: Documentação e Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada; v. 21, n. 1 (2005) ; 1678-460X ; 0102-4450 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Slaying the Great Green Dragon: Learning and modelling iterable ordered optional adjuncts
|
|
|
|
In: Fowlie, Meaghan. (2017). Slaying the Great Green Dragon: Learning and modelling iterable ordered optional adjuncts. UCLA: Linguistics 0510. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/640605fb (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Heads and Adjuncts: an experimental study of subextraction from participials and coordination in English, German and Norwegian ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Heads and Adjuncts: an experimental study of subextraction from participials and coordination in English, German and Norwegian
|
|
Brown, Jessica M. M.. - : University of Cambridge, 2017. : Modern and Medieval Languages, 2017. : Trinity Hall, 2017
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
On the argument-adjunct distinction in the Polish “Semantic Syntax” tradition
|
|
|
|
In: Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives; No 17 (2017) ; 2392-2397 (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|