| 1 |
Les pronoms possessifs du ḥassāniyya, entre héritage et innovation due au contact
|
|
|
|
In: Studies on Arabic Dialectology and Sociolinguistics. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of AIDA, June 10-13, 2019 ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03088164 ; G. Chikovani; Z. Tskhvediani. Studies on Arabic Dialectology and Sociolinguistics. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of AIDA, June 10-13, 2019, Akaki Tsereteli State University, pp.275-284, 2022, ISBN 978-9941-495-52-6 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Arguments and modifiers in deverbal nominals : Romanian Genitives and de-PPs
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
French de and en as expressions of the genitive case: a unified analysis within LFG and computational implementation in XLE1
|
|
|
|
In: DELTA: Documentação e Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada; v. 37 n. 1 (2021) ; 1678-460X ; 0102-4450 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Système nominal et acte de nommer dans des langues couchitiques parlées dans la Corne de l'Afrique
|
|
|
|
In: Journée d’études sur les langues sémitiques et couchitiques parlées dans la Corne de l'Afrique ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03480249 ; Marie-Claude Simeone-Senelle; Fatouma Mahamoud Hadji Ali; Mohamed Hassan Kamil. Journée d’études sur les langues sémitiques et couchitiques parlées dans la Corne de l'Afrique, Dec 2018, Djibouti, Djibouti. 1, 2021, Diversité des langues, 978-2-490768-04-2 ; https://lacito-publications.cnrs.fr (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Attributive possession
|
|
|
|
In: The Oxford Guide to the Bantu Languages ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03433050 ; The Oxford Guide to the Bantu Languages, In press (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
NPs in German: Locality, theta roles, possessives, and genitive arguments
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 6, No 1 (2021); 46 ; 2397-1835 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Système nominal et acte de nommer dans des langues couchitiques parlées dans la Corne de l'Afrique
|
|
|
|
In: Journée d’études sur les langues sémitiques et couchitiques parlées dans la Corne de l'Afrique ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03480249 ; Marie-Claude Simeone-Senelle; Fatouma Mahamoud Hadji Ali; Mohamed Hassan Kamil. Journée d’études sur les langues sémitiques et couchitiques parlées dans la Corne de l'Afrique, Dec 2018, Djibouti, Djibouti. 1, 2021, Diversité des langues, 978-2-490768-04-2 ; https://lacito-publications.cnrs.fr (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Attributive possession
|
|
|
|
In: The Oxford Guide to the Bantu Languages ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03433050 ; The Oxford Guide to the Bantu Languages, In press (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Авто- и гетеростереотипы в китайской и русской лингвокультурах ; Auto- and Heterostereotypes in Chinese and Russian Linguocultures
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
French de and en as expressions of the genitive case: a unified analysis within LFG and computational implementation in XLE
|
|
|
|
In: DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, Vol 37, Iss 1 (2021) (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
El genitivo agente como la interpretación semántica más prototípica del genitivo inglés: un estudio de corpus
|
|
|
|
In: Lingüística y Literatura, ISSN 0120-5587, null 42, Nº. 79, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Vol. 42, 79 (2021):ENERO-JUNIO, 2021), pags. 112-131 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Turkic default agreement
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Turkic and Languages in Contact with Turkic; Vol 5 (2020); 125-139 ; 2641-3485 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Restrictions on genitive subjects in Kazakh relative clauses
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Turkic and Languages in Contact with Turkic; Vol 5 (2020); 110-124 ; 2641-3485 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
The exponence of caseless NPs in Moksha
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 6, No 1 (2021): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 628–640 ; 2473-8689 (2021)
|
|
Abstract:
In this paper, I argue that the difference between indefinite- and definite-declension genitives in Moksha (Uralic) is not in the semantic or referential characteristics of the nominals they mark (as the name suggests), but rather in the syntactic size of the nominals. I show that there is no one-to-one correspondence between the definiteness of a noun phrase and its marking. In particular, indefinite-declension genitives can mark non-specific indefinite as well as specific definite noun phrases. At the same time, indefinite-declension genitives are number-neutral, while definite-declension genitives are specified for number. In contrast to indefinite-declension nominals, definite-declension ones also trigger possessive agreement on the head noun. I analyze indefinite-genitives as NPs and definite-genitives as DPs. Based on what is generally known about DPs, I make several predictions regarding the distribution of the genitives; two definite-declension genitives should be incompatible within one enclosing DP, while there should be no such restriction on the co-occurrence of an indefinite-declension genitive with either another indefinite-declension genitive or a definite-declension genitive. These predictions are borne out, and these new findings enrich the discussion of the ban on the co-occurrence of two DPs which are too close in the structure. More generally, my analysis supports the view that nominals of different structural size can coexist within one language.
|
|
Keyword:
agreement; Finno-Ugric; genitive case; Moksha; Morphology; noun phrase structure; small nominals; Syntax; Uralic
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v6i1.4999
http://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/PLSA/article/view/4999
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
