3 |
Metonymy in Frames : The Role of Functional Relations in Contiguity-Based Semantic Shifts of Nouns
|
|
Terhalle, Anselm L. (VerfasserIn). - 1. Auflage. - Düsseldorf : düsseldorf university press dup, 2022
|
|
IDS Mannheim
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Distinct neural signatures of schizotypy and psychopathy during visual word-nonword recognition
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Understanding teachers’ experiences in transitioning from a reading test preparation approach to a whole novel approach : a narrative case study.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Face processing in early development: a systematic review of behavioral studies and considerations in times of COVID-19 pandemic
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Legal ideology in the context of development of the legal state and formation of the civil society in Ukraine
|
|
|
|
In: Revista de Direito Internacional; v. 18, n. 3 (2021): International Law and Deglobalization ; 2237-1036 ; 2236-997X (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Teaching vocabulary to adolescents with language disorder: perspectives from teachers and speech and language therapists
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
A Systematic Review of Studies Describing the Effectiveness, Acceptability, and Potential Harms of Place-Based Interventions to Address Loneliness and Mental Health Problems
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Teaching vocabulary to adolescents with language disorder: Perspectives from teachers and speech and language therapists
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
A Systematically Conducted Scoping Review of the Evidence and Fidelity of Treatments for Verb and Sentence Deficits in Aphasia: Sentence Treatments
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Understanding and Supporting Peer Relationships in Adolescents with Acquired Brain Injury: A Stakeholder Engagement Study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Operationalising treatment success in aphasia rehabilitation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Developing, monitoring, and reporting of fidelity in aphasia trials: Core recommendations from the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists (CATs) Trials for Aphasia Panel
|
|
Behn, N.; Harrison, M.; Brady, M. C.; Breitenstein, C.; Carragher, M.; Fridriksson, J.; Godecke, E.; Hillis, A.; Kelly, H.; Palmer, R.; Rose, M. L.; Thomas, S.; Tippett, D.; Worrall, L.; Becker, F.; Hilari, K.. - : Routledge, 2022
|
|
Abstract:
Background: Developing, monitoring, and reporting of fidelity are essential and integral components to the design of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in stroke and aphasia. Treatment fidelity refers to the degree to which an intervention is delivered as intended and is directly related to the quality of the evidence generated by RCTs. Clear documentation of treatment fidelity in trials assists in the evaluation of the clinical implications of potential benefits attributed to the intervention. Consideration of the implementation requirements of a research-based intervention as intended in a clinical context is necessary to achieve similar outcomes for a clinical population. Despite this, treatment fidelity is rarely reported in RCTs of aphasia intervention. Aim: To describe fidelity strategies and develop core recommendations for developing, monitoring and reporting of fidelity in aphasia intervention RCTs. Scope: Relevant conceptual frameworks were considered. The Behaviour Change Consortium comprehensive framework of fidelity was adopted. It includes five areas: study design, training providers, delivery of treatment, treatment receipt, and treatment enactment. We explored fidelity in RCTs with a range of complex aphasia interventions (e.g., ASK, Big CACTUS, COMPARE, FCET2EC, POLAR, SUPERB, VERSE) and described how different trial design factors (e.g., phase of trial, explanatory vs. pragmatic, number and location of sites, number and type of treatment providers) influenced the fidelity strategies chosen. Strategies were mapped onto the five areas of the fidelity framework with a detailed exploration of how fidelity criteria were developed, measured, and monitored throughout each trial. This information was synthesised into a set of core recommendations to guide aphasia researchers towards the adequate measurement, capture, and reporting of fidelity within future aphasia intervention studies. Conclusions/Recommendations: Treatment fidelity should be a core consideration in planning an intervention trial, a concept that goes beyond treatment adherence alone. A range of strategies should be selected depending on the phase and design of the trial being undertaken and appropriate investment of time and costs should be considered.
|
|
Keyword:
RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
|
|
URL: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/27556/1/Fidelity%20in%20aphasia%20trials%20R1%20CLEAN.pdf https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2022.2037502 https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/27556/8/Developing%20monitoring%20and%20reporting%20of%20fidelity%20in%20aphasia%20trials%20core%20recommendations%20from%20the%20collaboration%20of%20aphasia%20trialists%20CATs%20trials%20for.pdf https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/27556/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
19 |
Cortical microstructure in primary progressive aphasia: a multicenter study.
|
|
|
|
In: Alzheimer's research & therapy, vol 14, iss 1 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Discrimination Experiences during COVID-19 among a National, Multi-Lingual, Community-Based Sample of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders: COMPASS Findings.
|
|
|
|
In: International journal of environmental research and public health, vol 19, iss 2 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|