| 1 |
Visual generics: How children understand generic language with different visualizations ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Subtle linguistic cues increase girls' engagement in science ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Subtle linguistic cues increase girls' engagement in science ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Visual generics: How adults understand generic language with different visualizations ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
The Influence of the Gender Asterisk ("Gendersternchen") on Comprehensibility and Interest
|
|
|
|
In: Frontiers in psychology 12 (2021) 760062. - 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.76006 -- Front Psychol -- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/1525/ -- https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology -- http://www.bibliothek.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/?2563826 -- 1664-1078 -- 1664-1078 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Generics as default? Comparing the acquisition of universals and generics in Spanish
|
|
|
|
In: Experiments in Linguistic Meaning; Vol 1 (2021); 90-100 ; 2694-1791 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
La fin du masculin générique ? Expériences et débats autour de l'écriture inclusive
|
|
|
|
In: Norma si uz in limbile romanice actuale. Romanica 31. ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02977447 ; Alexandra Cunita, Coman Lupu. Norma si uz in limbile romanice actuale. Romanica 31., editura universitatii din bucuresti, pp.181-202, 2020, 978-606-16-1183-6 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
A semantic theory of a subset of qualifying "as" phrases in English
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
States, events, and generics: computational modeling of situation entity types ... : Zustände, Ereignisse und Generizität: computergestützte Modellierung von Situationstypen ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
States, events, and generics: computational modeling of situation entity types ; Zustände, Ereignisse und Generizität: computergestützte Modellierung von Situationstypen
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Antecedent generics: how capes, lakes, mounts, and points are named in the Antipodes
|
|
|
|
In: Names: a journal of onomastics (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
The Meaning and Semantics of Singular Definite Noun Phrases
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
The Meaning and Semantics of Singular Definite Noun Phrases
|
|
|
|
In: Nichols, Paul. (2014). The Meaning and Semantics of Singular Definite Noun Phrases. UCLA: Philosophy 0651. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1x58d6vd (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
The same cognitive mechanism underlies reasoning about the features of kinds and the traits of individuals
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Learning about categories of things in the world (e.g., that lions have manes) and learning about the individuals around us (e.g., that the new neighbor is friendly) are both crucial cognitive tasks whose output enables people to behave adaptively in many novel circumstances. Aside from their importance to our lives, however, these two tasks seem to have little in common: Reasoning about the features of categories appears to rely on a set of computations that is entirely distinct from those involved in reasoning about the traits of individuals. Consistent with this impression, these judgments have been studied in near-complete isolation. Here, however, we propose that inferences about the features of kinds and the traits of individuals are in fact computed by the same cognitive mechanism. To test this hypothesis, we investigated whether kind-feature and individual-trait inferences share two distinctive signatures: namely, whether they are both facilitated by features/behaviors that are (1) threatening or (2) unique. Five experiments provided evidence for this prediction. The results also suggested that these signatures were not shared by other types of inferences. That is, the information that facilitated participants’ kind-feature and individual-trait inferences did not similarly facilitate quantified inferences concerning whether all/some members of a kind display a feature and whether an individual always/sometimes performs a behavior. By suggesting that inferences about the features of kinds and the traits of individuals share a cognitive source, these studies open possibilities for dialogue between the independent research traditions that have investigated these important aspects of human thought.
|
|
Keyword:
categories; generics; inductive inferences; quantifiers; trait attribution
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2142/49609
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Regularity and Event in the Functioning of the Schooling Pedagogical Discourse
|
|
|
|
In: Signum: Estudos da Linguagem, Vol 16, Iss 2, Pp 193-213 (2014) (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Genericity
|
|
|
|
In: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00992403 ; Alda Mari, Claire Beyssade, Fabio Del Prete. France. Oxford University Press, pp.464, 2013, Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics, 978-0-19-969180-7. ⟨10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691807.001.0001⟩ (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
