DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4 5...8
Hits 1 – 20 of 156

1
A Self-Paced Reading Study on Processing Constructions with Different Degrees of Compositionality
In: The 35th Annual Conference on Human Sentence Processing ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03620795 ; The 35th Annual Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Mar 2022, UC Santa Cruz, United States (2022)
BASE
Show details
2
Probing for the Usage of Grammatical Number ...
BASE
Show details
3
Does BERT really agree ? Fine-grained Analysis of Lexical Dependence on a Syntactic Task ...
BASE
Show details
4
Not all arguments are processed equally: a distributional model of argument complexity [<Journal>]
Chersoni, Emmanuele [Verfasser]; Santus, Enrico [Verfasser]; Lenci, Alessandro [Verfasser].
DNB Subject Category Language
Show details
5
Did the Cat Drink the Coffee? Challenging Transformers with Generalized Event Knowledge
In: Proceedings of *SEM 2021: The Tenth Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics ; SEM 2021: The Tenth Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03312774 ; SEM 2021: The Tenth Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics, Aug 2021, Online, France. pp.1-11, &#x27E8;10.18653/v1/2021.starsem-1.1&#x27E9; (2021)
BASE
Show details
6
Not all arguments are processed equally: a distributional model of argument complexity
In: ISSN: 1574-020X ; EISSN: 1574-0218 ; Language Resources and Evaluation ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03533181 ; Language Resources and Evaluation, Springer Verlag, 2021, 55 (4), pp.873-900. &#x27E8;10.1007/s10579-021-09533-9&#x27E9; (2021)
BASE
Show details
7
Universal Dependencies 2.9
Zeman, Daniel; Nivre, Joakim; Abrams, Mitchell. - : Universal Dependencies Consortium, 2021
BASE
Show details
8
Universal Dependencies 2.8.1
Zeman, Daniel; Nivre, Joakim; Abrams, Mitchell. - : Universal Dependencies Consortium, 2021
BASE
Show details
9
Universal Dependencies 2.8
Zeman, Daniel; Nivre, Joakim; Abrams, Mitchell. - : Universal Dependencies Consortium, 2021
BASE
Show details
10
Not all arguments are processed equally: a distributional model of argument complexity
In: Springer Netherlands (2021)
BASE
Show details
11
Decoding Word Embeddings with Brain-Based Semantic Features ...
BASE
Show details
12
Did the Cat Drink the Coffee? Challenging Transformers with Generalized Event Knowledge ...
BASE
Show details
13
A comparative evaluation and analysis of three generations of Distributional Semantic Models ...
BASE
Show details
14
Constructional associations trump lexical associations in processing valency coercion
BASE
Show details
15
Common-Sense and Common-Knowledge. How much do Neural Language Models know about the world?
In: http://etd.adm.unipi.it/theses/available/etd-03122021-000321/ (2021)
BASE
Show details
16
I neologismi nelle edizioni del 2010 e del 2021 del dizionario "Zingarelli della lingua italiana"
In: http://etd.adm.unipi.it/theses/available/etd-05102021-214231/ (2021)
BASE
Show details
17
Large-scale Cross-lingual Word Sense Disambiguation using Parallel Corpora
In: http://etd.adm.unipi.it/theses/available/etd-09112021-110903/ (2021)
BASE
Show details
18
Probing the linguistic knowledge of word embeddings: A case study on colexification
In: http://etd.adm.unipi.it/theses/available/etd-06212021-172428/ (2021)
BASE
Show details
19
"Love is an open door but not a table". Come uomini e macchine 'comprendono' le metafore lessicalizzate e creative.
In: http://etd.adm.unipi.it/theses/available/etd-03242021-214055/ (2021)
Abstract: Metaphor is a widespread linguistic and cognitive phenomenon. Many studies were carried out to investigate how humans understand and produce metaphors. A key aspect of the phenomenon is the difference between frozen and creative metaphors. It was shown that humans interpretate in a different way conventional metaphors and novel metaphors and that humans are sensible to this difference. Our study confirms that result. Furthermore, metaphors, especially creative ones, are difficult to model computationally. Recent progress has been made in metaphor identification, also thanks to the contextualized embeddings from models like BERT. To test what BERT, RoBERTa and GPT2 know about metaphors, we challenge them with a new dataset of conventional and creative metaphors accompanied by various types of human judgments. We find that the models can "recognize" metaphors and shows interesting abilities like that of predicting creative metaphors. At the same time, we show that the models still struggle in "interpreting" metaphorical language, even if it outperforms traditional static vectors. Our findings confirm previous claims about the abilities and limitations of the models. Furthermore, they show that RoBERTa has better performance than BERT and GPT2 in the first experiment and that BERT large is almost good in "interpreting" metaphors in the upper-intermediate layers as suggested by the results of the second experiment. Finally, the models seem to show some similarities with humans, but still miss a significant part of human intuitions about the meaning of metaphors.
Keyword: FILOLOGIA; LETTERATURA E LINGUISTICA
URL: http://etd.adm.unipi.it/theses/available/etd-03242021-214055/
BASE
Hide details
20
Le interpretazioni del concetto di composizionalita' delle espressioni idiomatiche nella letteratura psicolinguistica
In: http://etd.adm.unipi.it/theses/available/etd-09132021-151853/ (2021)
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5...8

Catalogues
5
0
7
0
3
0
0
Bibliographies
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
122
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern