1 |
Letter identity and visual similarity in the processing of diacritic letters. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Letter identity and visual similarity in the processing of diacritic letters.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Chunking and redintegration in verbal short-term memory. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Chunking and redintegration in verbal short-term memory.
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Memory for verbal material improves when words form familiar chunks. But how does the improvement due to chunking come about? Two possible explanations are that the input might be actively recoded into chunks, each of which takes up less memory capacity than items not forming part of a chunk (a form of data compression), or that chunking is based on redintegration. If chunking is achieved by redintegration, representations of chunks exist only in long-term memory (LTM) and help to reconstructing degraded traces in short-term memory (STM). In 6 experiments using 2-alternative forced choice recognition and immediate serial recall we find that when chunks are small (2 words) they display a pattern suggestive of redintegration, whereas larger chunks (3 words), show a pattern consistent with data compression. This concurs with previous data showing that there is a cost involved in recoding material into chunks in STM. With smaller chunks this cost seems to outweigh the benefits of recoding words into chunks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
|
|
Keyword:
Bayes Theorem; Choice Behavior; Computer Simulation; Female; Humans; Male; Memory; Mental Recall; Models; Psycholinguistics; Psychological; Psychological Tests; Psychology; Recognition; Short-Term; Speech Perception; Young Adult
|
|
URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/304638 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.51717
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
5 |
Transposed letter priming effects and allographic variation in Arabic: Insights from lexical decision and the same-different task. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Transposed letter priming effects and allographic variation in Arabic: Insights from lexical decision and the same-different task.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Orthographic and phonological priming effects in the same-different task. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Learning nonwords: the Hebb repetition effect as a model of word learning. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Is reading automatic? Are the ERP correlates of masked priming really lexical? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Is reading automatic? Are the ERP correlates of masked priming really lexical? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
What causes the greater perceived similarity of consonant-transposed nonwords? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Is reading automatic? Are the ERP correlates of masked priming really lexical? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
What causes the greater perceived similarity of consonant-transposed nonwords?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Is reading automatic? Are the ERP correlates of masked priming really lexical?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Orthographic and phonological priming effects in the same-different task.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Learning nonwords: the Hebb repetition effect as a model of word learning.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Orthographic and Phonological Priming Effects in the Same–Different Task
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Is reading automatic? Are the ERP correlates of masked priming really lexical?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|