Home Catalogue search

eng

Refine your search:

Search in the Catalogues and Directories






	Sort by
Simple Search

Page: 1 2

Hits 1 – 20 of 31

1	Translate Wisely! An Evaluation of Close and Adaptive Translation Procedures in an Experiment Involving Questionnaire Translation
	Repke, Lydia; Dorer, Brita
	In: International journal of sociology ; 51 ; 2 ; 135-162 (2022)
	BASE
	Show details

2	Warum wir so wenig über die Sprachen in Deutschland wissen: Spracheinstellungen als Erkenntnisbarriere
	Adler, Astrid; Ribeiro Silveira, Maria
	In: Diskurs Kindheits- und Jugendforschung / Discourse. Journal of Childhood and Adolescence Research ; 16 ; 4 ; 403-419 ; Perspektiven von Kindern und Jugendlichen auf sprachliche Diversität und Sprachbildungsprozesse (2021)
	BASE
	Show details

3	Afterword: Future Directions in Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural (3MC) Survey Research
	de Jong, Julie; Cibelli Hibben, Kristen; Kelley, Jennifer...
	In: The essential role of language in survey research ; 243-256 (2021)
	BASE
	Show details

4	Health monitoring among asylum seekers and refugees: a state-wide, cross-sectional, population-based study in Germany
	Ziegler, Sandra; Nöst, Stefan; Jahn, Rosa...
	In: Emerging Themes in Epidemiology ; 16 ; 1-21 (2021)
	BASE
	Show details

5	Multi-mode question pretesting: Using traditional cognitive interviews and online testing as complementary methods
	Kaplan, Robin L.; Edgar, Jennifer
	In: Survey Methods: Insights from the Field ; 1-14 ; Advancements in Online and Mobile Survey Methods (2021)
	BASE
	Show details

6	Assessing the use of back translation: the shortcomings of back translation as a quality testing method
	Behr, Dorothée
	In: International Journal of Social Research Methodology ; 20 ; 6 ; 573-584 (2021)
	BASE
	Show details

7	A Delphi study to identify content for a new questionnaire based on the 10 Principles of Dignity in Care
	Heuzenroeder, L.; Ibrahim, F.; Khadka, J.. - : Wiley, 2020
	BASE
	Show details

8	Integration of Migrant Populations into Health Monitoring in Germany: Results from a Feasibility Study
	Zeisler, Marie-Luise; Lemcke, Johannes
	In: Survey Methods: Insights from the Field ; 1-11 ; Probability and Nonprobability Sampling: Sampling of hard-to-reach survey populations (2019)
	BASE
	Show details

9	Language Barriers during the Fieldwork of the IAB-BAMF-SOEP Survey of Refugees in Germany
	Jacobsen, Jannes
	In: Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Issues ; 19 ; GESIS-Schriftenreihe ; 75-84 ; GESIS Symposium on "Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Aspects" (2018)
	BASE
	Show details

10	The Development of a Research Programme to Translate and Test the Personal Well-being Questions in Sylheti and Urdu
	Comanaru, Ruxandra; D'Ardenne, Jo
	In: Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Issues ; 19 ; GESIS-Schriftenreihe ; 13-27 ; GESIS Symposium on "Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Aspects" (2018)
	BASE
	Show details

11	Surveying Immigrants: The Role of Language Attrition and Language Change in the Application of Questionnaires
	Brzoska, Patrick
	In: Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Issues ; 19 ; GESIS-Schriftenreihe ; 95-105 ; GESIS Symposium on "Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Aspects" (2018)
	BASE
	Show details

12	Linguistic and Cultural Aspects in Migrant Surveys: Introduction and Overview
	Behr, Dorothée; Brzoska, Patrick; Schoua-Glusberg, Alisú
	In: Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Issues ; 19 ; GESIS-Schriftenreihe ; 5-12 ; GESIS Symposium on "Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Aspects" (2018)
	BASE
	Show details

13	Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Issues
	In: 19 ; GESIS-Schriftenreihe ; 108 ; GESIS Symposium on "Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Aspects" (2018)
	BASE
	Show details

14	The Place of Expert Review in Translation and Questionnaire Evaluation for Hard-to-Count Populations in National Surveys
	Goerman, Patricia; Meyers, Mikelyn; García Trejo, Yazmín
	In: Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Issues ; 19 ; GESIS-Schriftenreihe ; 29-41 ; GESIS Symposium on "Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Aspects" (2018)
	BASE
	Show details

15	Translating Answers to Open-ended Survey Questions in Cross-cultural Research: A Case Study on the Interplay between Translation, Coding, and Analysis
	Behr, Dorothée
	In: Field Methods ; 27 ; 3 ; 284-299 (2018)
	BASE
	Show details

16	A Comparison of Two Cognitive Pretesting Techniques Supported by Eye Tracking
	Neuert, Cornelia; Lenzner, Timo
	In: Social Science Computer Review ; 34 ; 5 ; 582-596 (2018)
	BASE
	Show details

17	Measuring migrants’ educational attainment: The CAMCES tool in the IAB-SOEP migration sample
	Schneider, Silke L.; Briceno-Rosas, Roberto; Ortmanns, Verena...
	In: Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Issues, pp. 43-74 (2018)
	BASE
	Show details

18	Respondents' ratings of expressions from response scales: a two-country, two-language investigation on equivalence and translation
	Mohler, Peter Ph.; Smith, Tom W.; Harkness, Janet
	In: Cross-cultural survey equivalence ; 3 ; ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial ; 159-184 (2017)
	BASE
	Show details

19	Developing a low-cost technique for parallel cross-cultural instrument development: the Question Appraisal System (QAS-04)
	Dean, Elizabeth; Caspar, Rachel; McAvinchey, Georgina...
	In: Methodological aspects in cross-national research ; 11 ; ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial ; 31-46 (2016)
	BASE
	Show details

20	Text and context: challenges to comparability in survey questions
	Braun, Michael; Harkness, Janet
	In: Methodological aspects in cross-national research ; 11 ; ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial ; 95-107 (2016)
	Abstract: In crosslingualen, kulturvergleichenden Untersuchungen spielt die richtige Sprache und Übersetzung oft eine Schlüsselrolle, wenn es um interkulturelle Vergleichbarkeit geht. Manchmal scheint die Sprache als solche im Mittelpunkt zu stehen, manchmal eine Mischung aus Sprache, Sprachgebrauch und Kultur. Ein anderes Mal haben Probleme der "Äquivalenz" weniger etwas mit Sprache und Sprachgebrauch zu tun als damit, wie kulturelle Kontexte das Frageverstehen der Befragten rahmen. Die Verfasser zeigen anhand spezifischer kultureller Kontexte, wie kognitive und kommunikative Prozesse unterschiedliche Interpretationen von Fragestellungen verursachen können. Sie illustrieren solche Äquivalenzprobleme anhand von Beispielen und machen sichtbar, wie kulturelle Kontexte - an Sprache geknüpft oder nicht - mit der Perzeption von Fragen in ähnlicher Weise zusammen hängen wie der aus der kognitiven Forschung bekannte Einfluss des Fragenkontextes auf das Verständnis der Fragen durch die Befragten. Die Verfasser sehen Fragenkontexte immer als kulturell verankert an. Die Effekte, die von einem Sprachsystem, dessen Gebrauch und einem spezifischen kulturellen Kontext ausgehen, sind oft nur schwer zu entwirren. Die Verfasser fragen nach der Beziehung von sprachlichen und nicht-sprachlichen Aspekten von Fragen in einem Kontext, der Probleme für Vergleichbarkeit und "Äquivalenz" verursacht. Ausgewählte Beispiele illustrieren die Nützlichkeit eines integrierten Ansatzes, wenn es um sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung über sprachliche und kulturelle Grenzen hinweg geht. (ICEÜbers) ; "In cross-lingual, cross-cultural studies, appropriate language and translations often play a key role in securing cross-cultural comparability. Sometimes language-as-language seems to be the foremost issue, sometimes more a blend of language, language use, and culture. At other times, problems of 'equivalence' have less to do with language and how it is used than how cultural contexts frame respondents' understanding of questions. In the following we set out to explain how - against the backdrop of specific cultural contexts - cognitive and communicative processes can trigger different interpretations of survey items. The paper provides illustrations of each of these challenges to 'equivalence' and demonstrates how cultural contexts - whether linked to language or not - are related to respondents' perceptions of what questions mean in ways similar to effects noted in cognitive research on the influence of question context and co-text on respondents' perception of meaning. In fact, we suggest that question contexts are always culturally anchored contexts. The effects of a language system, its usage, and the specific cultural context are frequently difficult to disentangle. The paper explores the relationship between language-anchored features and non-linguistic aspects of survey questions in contexts that create problems for 'equivalence' or comparability. Selected examples illustrate the usefulness of an integrated framework in trying to come to terms with social science research across different cultures and languages." (author's abstract)
	Keyword: anthropology; basic research; comparative research; Computer Methods; cultural factors; development of methods; Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften; Fragebogen; general conditions; Grundlagenforschung; intercultural comparison; intercultural factors; interkulturelle Faktoren; interkultureller Vergleich; kulturelle Faktoren; language; language usage; Methodenentwicklung; Methods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis; questionnaire; Rahmenbedingung; Social sciences; sociology; Sozialwissenschaften; Soziologie; Sprache; Sprachgebrauch; Statistical Methods; survey research; Umfrageforschung; understanding; vergleichende Forschung; Verstehen
	URL: http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-49153-2 http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/49153
	BASE
	Hide details

Page: 1 2

© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern