4 |
Neural Correlates of Phonetic Adaptation as Induced by Lexical and Audiovisual Context ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Bilingual phonology in dichotic perception: A case study of Malayalam and English voicing
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 5, No 1 (2020); 73 ; 2397-1835 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Audiovisual and lexical cues do not additively enhance perceptual adaptation
|
|
|
|
In: Psychon Bull Rev (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Interleaved lexical and audiovisual information can retune phoneme boundaries
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Neural correlates of phonetic adaptation as induced by lexical and audiovisual context
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Universals of listening : equivalent prosodic entrainment in tone and non-tone languages
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Vocabulary structure affects word recognition : evidence from German listeners
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Bilingual phonology in dichotic perception : a case study of Malayalam and English voicing
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Audiovisual and lexical cues do not additively enhance perceptual adaptation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Interleaved lexical and audiovisual information can retune phoneme boundaries ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
KemberEtAl-SuppInfo-SecondRevision – Supplemental material for The Processing of Linguistic Prominence ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
KemberEtAl-SuppInfo-SecondRevision – Supplemental material for The Processing of Linguistic Prominence ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
The dynamics of lexical activation and competition in bilinguals' first versus second language
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Speech input causes listeners to activate multiple candidate words which then compete with one another. These include onset competitors, that share a beginning (bumper, butter), but also, counterintuitively, rhyme competitors, sharing an ending (bumper, jumper). In L1, competition is typically stronger for onset than for rhyme. In L2, onset competition has been attested but rhyme competition has heretofore remained largely unexamined. We assessed L1 (Dutch) and L2 (English) word recognition by the same late-bilingual individuals. In each language, eye gaze was recorded as listeners heard sentences and viewed sets of drawings: three unrelated, one depicting an onset or rhyme competitor of a word in the input. Activation patterns revealed substantial onset competition but no significant rhyme competition in either L1 or L2. Rhyme competition may thus be a “luxury” feature of maximally efficient listening, to be abandoned when resources are scarcer, as in listening by late bilinguals, in either language.
|
|
Keyword:
470410 - Phonetics and speech science
|
|
URL: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:62717 https://assta.org/proceedings/ICPhS2019/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|