| 1 |
Are there really interactive processes in speech perception?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Explaining cross-linguistic differences in effects of lexical stress on spoken-word recognition
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Perceptual compensation for voice assimilation of German fricatives
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Number agreement in British and American english : disagreeing to agree collectively
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Phonological and conceptual activation in speech comprehension
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
We propose that speech comprehension involves the activation of token representations of the phonological forms of current lexical hypotheses, separately from the ongoing construction of a conceptual interpretation of the current utterance. In a series of cross-modal priming experiments, facilitation of lexical decision responses to visual target words (e.g., time) was found for targets that were semantic associates of auditory prime words (e.g., date) when the primes were isolated words, but not when the same primes appeared in sentence contexts. Identity priming (e.g., faster lexical decisions to visual date after spoken date than after an unrelated prime) appeared, however, both with isolated primes and with primes in prosodically neutral sentences. Associative priming in sentence contexts only emerged when sentence prosody involved contrastive accents, or when sentences were terminated immediately after the prime. Associative priming is therefore not an automatic consequence of speech processing. In no experiment was there associative priming from embedded words (e.g., sedate-time), but there was inhibitory identity priming (e.g., sedate-date) from embedded primes in sentence contexts. Speech comprehension therefore appears to involve separate distinct activation both of token phonological word representations and of conceptual word representations. Furthermore, both of these types of representation are distinct from the long-term memory representations of word form and meaning.
|
|
Keyword:
200499 - Linguistics not elsewhere classified; priming; psycholinguistics; speech
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.03.001
http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/34681
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Formant transitions in fricative identification : the role of native fricative inventory
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Frequency and form as determinants of functor sensitivity in English-acquiring infants
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
